Mail Thread Index
- [Scheme-reports] announcement of scheme-reports.org,
Jonathan Rees
- [Scheme-reports] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters,
Marc Feeley
- Message not available
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters,
Brian Harvey
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters,
Peter Michaux
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters,
Alaric Snell-Pym
[Scheme-reports] Comments on revised WG1 charter,
Brian Harvey
[Scheme-reports] Comments on revised WG1 charter,
will
[Scheme-reports] contact with working groups,
Thomas Bushnell BSG
[Scheme-reports] Fwd: [r6rs-discuss] Volunteering for Scheme language standardization working groups ***deadline January 8***,
Jonathan Rees
[Scheme-reports] Fwd: Trying to volunteer,
Marc Feeley
[Scheme-reports] working group 1 public resources,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] Keywords,
Vincent Manis
[Scheme-reports] For WG1: Byte-vector literal syntax,
Tony Garnock-Jones
[Scheme-reports] make-encapsulated-type,
Bill Schottstaedt
Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs,
Brian Harvey
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs,
David Rush
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs,
Brian Harvey
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs,
Anton van Straaten
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs,
Brian Harvey
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs,
David Rush
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs,
Alex Queiroz
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs,
Brian Harvey
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs,
David Rush
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs,
David Rush
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs,
Aaron W. Hsu
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs,
Benjamin L. Russell
[Scheme-reports] Haskell's incremental approach,
Alex Queiroz
[Scheme-reports] [ANN] LAST CHANCE TO REGISTER ONLINE for 2010 Workshop on Scheme and Functional Programming,
Marc Feeley
[Scheme-reports] No procedure to ask the current time?,
Jeronimo Pellegrini
[Scheme-reports] Changing bits of bytes in byte vectors?,
Jeronimo Pellegrini
[Scheme-reports] New features in WG1 Scheme,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1,
Larry D. Lee jr.
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1,
Larry D. Lee jr.
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] scheme - mysql and Gui,
Nataraj S Narayan
[Scheme-reports] randomness in wg1,
Marco Benelli
[Scheme-reports] New features in WG1 Scheme redux,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Neil Van Dyke
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Adrien "Pied" Piérard
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Neil Van Dyke
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
r6rsguy
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Per Bothner
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
John Cowan
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
John Cowan
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Brian Harvey
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
John Cowan
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Faré
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme,
Christopher Chittleborough
[Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Taylor R Campbell
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
John Cowan
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Taylor R Campbell
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Taylor R Campbell
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Taylor R Campbell
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Taylor R Campbell
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Taylor R Campbell
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Vitaly Magerya
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Vitaly Magerya
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Vitaly Magerya
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Vitaly Magerya
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Taylor R Campbell
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Taylor R Campbell
- Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake,
Vitaly Magerya
Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Peter Kourzanov
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Per Bothner
- [Scheme-reports] LAMBDA and Unicode (Was: [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS),
Shiro Kawai
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] LAMBDA and Unicode (Was: Scheme pattern matching & R*RS),
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] LAMBDA and Unicode (Was: [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS),
Alex Shinn
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] LAMBDA and Unicode,
Shiro Kawai
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Adrien "Pied" Piérard
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] freshmen & unicode lambda's,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] need to overload (case) for pattern-matching,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
David Rush
- Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Jim Wise
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Jim Wise
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Vincent Manis
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Vincent Manis
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Andre van Tonder
- [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
John Cowan
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
David Rush
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
David Rush
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
David Van Horn
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Per Bothner
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Andre van Tonder
- [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
David Rush
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Jim Wise
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Jim Wise
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
John Cowan
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
John Cowan
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
Peter Kourzanov
- Message not available
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
John Cowan
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
John Cowan
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?,
John Cowan
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Bigloo,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Bigloo,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Brian Harvey
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Vincent Manis
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Vincent Manis
- Re: [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Vincent Manis
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Vincent Manis
- [Scheme-reports] Scheme is NOT spam!,
Vincent Manis
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Vincent Manis
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Vincent Manis
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
John Cowan
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
John Cowan
- [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme as FP assembly language,
Peter Kourzanov
- [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme as FP assembly language,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching,
John Cowan
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
John Cowan
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
John Cowan
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
Adrien "Pied" Piérard
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?,
Adrien "Pied" Piérard
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] case reborn,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
Adrien "Pied" Piérard
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] do we need to redefine eqv?,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?,
John Cowan
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?,
Shiro Kawai
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?,
Peter Kourzanov
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
John Cowan
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case),
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Per Bothner
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] match.scm,
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: case, alternatives, arrows,
Peter Kourzanov
[Scheme-reports] Numeric towers,
Vincent Manis
Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents",
Aubrey Jaffer
[Scheme-reports] Module Directory,
Noah Lavine
[Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
OKUMURA Yuki
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
OKUMURA Yuki
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
OKUMURA Yuki
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Vitaly Magerya
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Vitaly Magerya
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Vitaly Magerya
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Vitaly Magerya
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
John Cowan
- [Scheme-reports] DELAY AND FORCE,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] DELAY AND FORCE,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] DELAY AND FORCE,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] DELAY AND FORCE,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] DELAY AND FORCE,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] DELAY AND FORCE,
Eli Barzilay
- [Scheme-reports] Regions of imports unspecified,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Regions of imports unspecified,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Regions of imports unspecified,
Alex Shinn
- [Scheme-reports] What are regions of toplevel imports?,
Andre van Tonder
- [Scheme-reports] EVAL,
Andre van Tonder
- [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...),
Andre van Tonder
- [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Andre van Tonder
- [Scheme-reports] COND, CASE, AND, ... macros are buggy,
Andre van Tonder
- [Scheme-reports] Buggy definition of BEGIN,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Buggy definition of BEGIN,
Jussi Piitulainen
- [Scheme-reports] Restrictions on internal BEGIN?,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Restrictions on internal BEGIN?,
Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] COND, CASE, AND, ... macros are buggy,
Alex Shinn
- [Scheme-reports] Toplevel import scoping,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Toplevel import scoping,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Toplevel import scoping,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Toplevel import scoping,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Andy Wingo
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Sztefan Edwards
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Jim Rees
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Perry E. Metzger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Perry E. Metzger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Andy Wingo
Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?,
Jim Rees
Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...),
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...),
Andre van Tonder
Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...),
Peter Bex
Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...),
Andy Wingo
Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...),
Ray Dillinger
Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...),
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] EVAL,
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] EVAL,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] What are regions of toplevel imports?,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] Internal syntax definition order problem,
Andre van Tonder
Re: [Scheme-reports] Internal syntax definition order problem,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Internal syntax definition order problem,
Andre van Tonder
[Scheme-reports] Mutable exports,
Andre van Tonder
Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable exports,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] Internal definition shadowing problems,
Andre van Tonder
[Scheme-reports] Importing identifier more than once,
Andre van Tonder
Re: [Scheme-reports] Importing identifier more than once,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Internal definition shadowing problems,
Aaron W. Hsu
Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Aaron W. Hsu
Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Peter Bex
Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Alex Shinn
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andrzej
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andrzej
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andrzej
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andrzej
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andy Wingo
- Message not available
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andrzej
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Jim Rees
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andrzej
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Jim Rees
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andrzej
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andrzej
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Andrzej
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available,
Ray Dillinger
[Scheme-reports] R7RS 1st draft, initial environment and related notions,
Jussi Piitulainen
[Scheme-reports] R7RS 1st draft, parameterize body; guard macro definition,
Jussi Piitulainen
[Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else,
Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else,
Jim Rees
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else,
Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Please make internal BEGIN a splicing form,
Andre van Tonder
[Scheme-reports] Template pattern grammar seems broken,
Andre van Tonder
[Scheme-reports] Rebinding syntactic keywords as variables,
Andre van Tonder
[Scheme-reports] When ... is a literal,
Andre van Tonder
[Scheme-reports] Redefinition and shadowing in module bodies?,
Andre van Tonder
[Scheme-reports] Shadowing imports at toplevel,
Andre van Tonder
[Scheme-reports] Do record type NAMEs shadow somhow?,
Andre van Tonder
[Scheme-reports] Are record field names bound by a record type def?,
Andre van Tonder
[Scheme-reports] Error in comment syntax grammar,
Malcolm Tredinnick
[Scheme-reports] char-numeric? and unicode "numeric" property,
Shiro Kawai
[Scheme-reports] A couple more typos or ambiguities,
Malcolm Tredinnick
[Scheme-reports] Proposing amending char-numeric? definition,
Shiro Kawai
[Scheme-reports] Exception handling,
Vincent Manis
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling,
Vincent Manis
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling,
Vincent Manis
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling,
Vincent Manis
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling,
Vincent Manis
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling,
John Cowan
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Scheme-reports] exception handling,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] Introduction and additional material,
Vincent Manis
[Scheme-reports] Missing description of complex polar form,
Malcolm Tredinnick
[Scheme-reports] Fwd: Missing description of complex polar form,
Vincent Manis
[Scheme-reports] I/O,
Vincent Manis
[Scheme-reports] Fwd: Re: Fwd: Missing description of complex polar form,
Vincent Manis
[Scheme-reports] Fwd: I/O,
Vincent Manis
[Scheme-reports] I/O redux,
Vincent Manis
Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...),
Andrzej
[Scheme-reports] The SYNTAX-RULES macro phase error,
Andre van Tonder
[Scheme-reports] define-record-type queries,
leppie
Message not available
Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple returns from map functions?,
Aaron W. Hsu
[Scheme-reports] inexact->exact and vice versa,
Vincent Manis
[Scheme-reports] Multiple values in BEGIN,
Ian Price
[Scheme-reports] Character/string case and the unicode module,
Jeronimo Pellegrini
[Scheme-reports] Binary and character ports (and an unrelated small issue),
Jeronimo Pellegrini
[Scheme-reports] WG1 Scheme as a language for CS1,
Vincent Manis
[Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Jim Rees
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Sztefan Edwards
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling,
Jim Rees
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling,
Jim Rees
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling,
Jim Rees
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling,
xacc.ide
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling,
Aaron W. Hsu
[Scheme-reports] bodies in case and cond clauses,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Jim Rees
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Jim Rees
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Jim Rees
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values",
Alaric Snell-Pym
[Scheme-reports] strange language in spec of `and' and `or',
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 4.2.2. binding constructs,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 4.2.3 sequencing,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] organizational comment regarding modules,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 4.2.6 dynamic bindings,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 4.2.8 quasiquotation,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 4.3.2 pattern language,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 5.1 programs,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] when and unless,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
Sztefan Edwards
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
Pierpaolo Bernardi
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
Alex Queiroz
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
Jeronimo Pellegrini
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
Pierpaolo Bernardi
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
leppie
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
Pierpaolo Bernardi
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
leppie
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
Pierpaolo Bernardi
- Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless,
Aaron W. Hsu
[Scheme-reports] 5.4 record type definitions,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 5.5.1 module syntax,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 6.1 equivalence predicates,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 6.2 numbers,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 6.3.1 booleans,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 6.3.2 pairs and lists,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 6.3.3 symbols,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 6.3.4 characters,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 6.3.5 strings,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
John Cowan
- [Scheme-reports] Multiple values,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Multiple values,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Multiple values,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Jim Wise
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Jim Wise
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
xacc.ide
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] return value of (parameter 'new-value),
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 6.5 exceptions,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 6.7.1 ports,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] close-port,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 6.7.4 system interfaces,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 7.1.1 lexical structure,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] features,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] NEWS section,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] well hey that was fun or something!,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] Can records be written and read?,
Andre van Tonder
[Scheme-reports] BEGIN-FOR-SYNTAX,
Manuel Simoni
[Scheme-reports] Texinfo,
Emmanuel Medernach
[Scheme-reports] a call for peace,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] Technical question,
Eli Barzilay
[Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.,
Jay Reynolds Freeman
- Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.,
Jay Reynolds Freeman
- Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.,
Shiro Kawai
- Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.,
Jay Reynolds Freeman
- Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.,
Jay Reynolds Freeman
- Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] values,
Razvan Rotaru
[Scheme-reports] Values and tuples,
Hans Aberg
[Scheme-reports] 6.7.4 load,
Jonathan Kraut
[Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions,
Jonathan Kraut
[Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
Eli Barzilay
- [Scheme-reports] Programming languages and implementation strategies,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library",
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] quasiquote and cycles,
Arthur A. Gleckler
[Scheme-reports] WG1/WG2 Scheme naming proposal,
Denis Washington
[Scheme-reports] Next draft release date?,
Denis Washington
[Scheme-reports] R7RS small language third draft available,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 1,
Denis Washington
[Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 2,
Denis Washington
[Scheme-reports] #! as general directive prefix?,
Denis Washington
[Scheme-reports] Omission in draft 3,
Malcolm Tredinnick
[Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 4,
Denis Washington
[Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5,
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5,
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5,
Jim Wise
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5,
Alex Queiroz
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5,
Jim Wise
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5,
Jim Wise
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5,
Raffael Cavallaro
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 (2),
Denis Washington
[Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?,
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?,
Raffael Cavallaro
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?,
Raffael Cavallaro
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?,
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?,
Alex Queiroz
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?,
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?,
Jonáš Vidra
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?,
leppie
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?,
Arthur A. Gleckler
[Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
Shiro Kawai
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] (command-line) needs to specify argv[0] behavior,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] Ticket #214 "string/symbol escape sequence confusing",
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] current-XXX-port is binary?,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] Ticket for extended "Overview of Scheme" chapter,
Denis Washington
[Scheme-reports] Small comments on draft 3,
Sven Hartrumpf
[Scheme-reports] Dividing Section 6.3,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Malcolm Tredinnick
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Shiro Kawai
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] Rational? and real? predicates,
Peter Bex
[Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
leppie
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
leppie
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Vincent St-Amour
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Vincent St-Amour
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Vincent St-Amour
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Vincent St-Amour
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i),
Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i),
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i),
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i),
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i),
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i),
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i),
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i),
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i),
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i),
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i),
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i),
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i),
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i),
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i),
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i),
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i),
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i),
Hans Aberg
[Scheme-reports] Formal syntax versus text,
Jussi Piitulainen
[Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors?,
Alex Queiroz
[Scheme-reports] Hardcoded identifier names in formal syntax,
Peter Bex
[Scheme-reports] Fwd: Poll: intentions concerning the R7RS "small" language,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN,
Aubrey Jaffer
Re: [Scheme-reports] John Cowan's rationales for 4th ballot votes,
Denis Washington
[Scheme-reports] Nasal demons in R7RS-small,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Division by zero,
Peter Bex
[Scheme-reports] Complex numbers with infinities and NaN,
Peter Bex
[Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)",
Aaron W. Hsu
- [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)",
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)",
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)",
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)",
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)",
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)",
leppie
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)",
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)",
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)",
Andre van Tonder
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes,
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes,
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes,
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes,
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes,
Denis Washington
[Scheme-reports] Recommendations regarding module filesystem mapping,
Denis Washington
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)",
Bill Schottstaedt
[Scheme-reports] the humble pk,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] Is this thing on?,
Vincent Manis
[scheme-reports-wg1] distributed repository and call for names,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] distributed repository: README.txt doc as package requirement,
John Gabriele
[Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot,
Alex Shinn
- [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ticket #281 withdrawn,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281,
xacc.ide
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281,
xacc.ide
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281,
xacc.ide
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281,
Alaric Snell-Pym
[Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN,
will
[Scheme-reports] Video of John Cowan's R7RS talk at LispNYC online,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism,
Denis Washington
[Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4,
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4,
Jeronimo Pellegrini
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Grant Rettke
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Grant Rettke
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Denis Washington
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
Andre van Tonder
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] initial results of implementor intentions poll,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] Dedication of R7RS-small,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI?,
Grant Rettke
[Scheme-reports] How do distributions verify conformance to the standard?,
Grant Rettke
[scheme-reports-wg1],
Benjamin L. Russell
[Scheme-reports] R7RS small in R6RS library,
OKUMURA Yuki
[Scheme-reports] draft 5 available,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name?,
Jeronimo Pellegrini
[Scheme-reports] Can a library keep state?,
Jeronimo Pellegrini
[Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level,
Alex Queiroz
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level,
Bakul Shah
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level,
Alex Shinn
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification,
Shiro Kawai
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification,
Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification,
John Cowan
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification,
Alaric Snell-Pym
[Scheme-reports] return value(s) of load,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] Fwd: Symbol escapes - clarification,
Vincent Manis
[Scheme-reports] Three really picky points,
Vincent Manis
[Scheme-reports] Module Versioning,
Roderic Morris
[Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Andy Wingo
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Vincent Manis
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
xacc.ide
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings,
Aubrey Jaffer
[Scheme-reports] Two issues regarding I/O,
Vincent Manis
[Scheme-reports] Fwd: fresh empty strings,
Vincent Manis
[Scheme-reports] searching for libraries,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] R7RS public comment period,
Marc Feeley
[Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Vitaly Magerya
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Vitaly Magerya
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Vitaly Magerya
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Vitaly Magerya
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Vitaly Magerya
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Vitaly Magerya
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Vitaly Magerya
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
Perry E. Metzger
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] Hex Typo,
Andrew Robbins
[Scheme-reports] bytevector-copy-partial, bytevector-copy-partial! thinko,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] multiple NaN values,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] Typo in Formal Semantics,
OOHASHI Daichi
[Scheme-reports] comments on draft 6: Libraries and Relationship of small/large lang,
Kun Liang
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists,
Stephen Leach
[Scheme-reports] Equality of records,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Centered Division,
Noah Lavine
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI.,
Alan Watson
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Arthur Smyles
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Arthur Smyles
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Andrew Robbins
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Noah Lavine
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbolelement>*| to #"<string element>*",
Cory Burgett
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Stephen Leach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Arthur Smyles
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
Alaric Snell-Pym
[Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses,
leppie
- Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses,
leppie
- Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses,
leppie
- Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses,
leppie
- Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
Helmut Eller
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
leppie
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
Helmut Eller
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
leppie
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
Helmut Eller
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
Helmut Eller
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
Helmut Eller
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
Helmut Eller
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples,
Andy Wingo
- [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples],
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well..,
Biep
Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value,
Peter Bex
[Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers?,
Peter Bex
[Scheme-reports] The history of EQV? on numbers,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Rounding procedures with inf/nan,
Peter Bex
[Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax,
quad
[Scheme-reports] Ref cells,
Biep
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit),
Alan Watson
[Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes,
Aubrey Jaffer
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] fifth ballot results are in,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] command-line,
Bill Schottstaedt
- Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line,
Bill Schottstaedt
- Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line,
Bill Schottstaedt
- Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line,
Noah Lavine
- Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line,
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line,
Aleksej Saushev
- Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line,
Emmanuel Medernach
[Scheme-reports] Blowing off the R5RS names QUOTIENT, REMAINDER, and MODULO,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Unintended consequences of #319,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines,
Alan Watson
[Scheme-reports] Vertical bar in the grammar,
Alan Watson
[Scheme-reports] I/O,
Kristen Eisenberg
Re: [Scheme-reports] Undelimited identifiers?,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal comment: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs,
John Boyle
[Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity,
Peter Bex
[Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Andrew Robbins
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers,
Daniel Villeneuve
- Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers,
Peter Bex
- [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
Noah Lavine
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
John J Foerch
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
John J Foerch
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
John J Foerch
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
John J Foerch
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package,
Daniel Villeneuve
- Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers,
Ray Dillinger
[Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions,
Daniel Villeneuve
[scheme-reports-wg1] Trac Migration Complete,
Aaron W. Hsu
[Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: circular datum example,
Daniel Villeneuve
[Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless,
Daniel Villeneuve
[Scheme-reports] Issues with <comment> grammar rule,
Mike Morgan
[Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Duncan Steele
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Duncan Steele
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
Alex Shinn
- [Scheme-reports] Unsafe optimizations,
Göran Weinholt
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] (no subject),
Johan van der Teems
[Scheme-reports] Reminder: public comment period on R7RS-small closes on June 30,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports,
Wolfgang De Meuter
[Scheme-reports] Formal - Internal syntax definitions vs a body with definitions being a letrec*,
Jussi Piitulainen
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?,
Richard Kelsey
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?,
Richard Kelsey
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Minor things in draft six of small-language report seven,
Jussi Piitulainen
[Scheme-reports] R7RS Additional material,
Jussi Piitulainen
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: scope of #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case,
Richard Kelsey
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case,
Richard Kelsey
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: add write-string to (scheme base),
Arthur Smyles
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: when does eqv? return #t for procedures?,
Richard Kelsey
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features,
Richard Kelsey
[Scheme-reports] Opinion about R7RS,
Jean-Michel HUFFLEN
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules,
Richard Kelsey
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: continuation used when 'guard' re-raises an exception,
Richard Kelsey
[Scheme-reports] minor editorial changes,
Richard Kelsey
[Scheme-reports] Reminder: R7RS public comment period,
William D Clinger
[Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
Aaron W . Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
Aubrey Jaffer
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
Robert Smith
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
will
[Scheme-reports] Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures,
Marc Feeley
[Scheme-reports] List of named characters is incomplete,
Marc Feeley
[Scheme-reports] digit-value,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value,
Pierpaolo Bernardi
- Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value,
Pierpaolo Bernardi
- Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value,
John Cowan
- Message not available
- Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences,
Marc Feeley
[Scheme-reports] Bidirectional ports and port-open?,
Marc Feeley
[Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
Jonathan Rees
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
Jonathan Rees
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
Aaron W . Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
Aaron W . Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
Aaron W . Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
John Boyle
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
Aaron W . Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
Aaron W . Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
John Boyle
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
John Boyle
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
Aaron W . Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
John Boyle
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] string-fill!,
Marc Feeley
[Scheme-reports] Sequence to sequence conversion,
Marc Feeley
[Scheme-reports] Library declarations in included files,
Alan Watson
[Scheme-reports] must list-copy handle cycles?,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] char-upcase/char-downcase/char-foldcase should be deprecated,
Per Bothner
Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences,
Michael Lenaghan
[Scheme-reports] drop string-map and string-for-each,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics,
Michael Sperber
[Scheme-reports] Formal comment: What is a dynamic environment?,
Michael Sperber
[Scheme-reports] Formal comment: Adoption of R6RS,
Michael Sperber
[Scheme-reports] Incompatibilities between R5RS and R7RS-small,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] quasisyntax extension,
Stefan Israelsson Tampe
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #360: Change syntax of escaped symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*",
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] John Cowan's votes on the sixth ballot,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Automatic delay-force,
Devon Schudy
[Scheme-reports] decoding strings from bytevectors,
Marijn
[Scheme-reports] Preliminary vote,
Emmanuel Medernach
[Scheme-reports] WG1BallotRead published, John Cowan's comments,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] (angle -0.0-0.0i) should be -pi, but R7RS-draft-6 prohibits this,
Mark H Weaver
[Scheme-reports] Definition of expt (was #391 - a selection of error predicates),
Mark H Weaver
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@x - 13 Messages in 5 Topics,
Noah Lavine
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@x - 13 Messages in 5 Topics,
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@x - 13 Messages in 5 Topics,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@x - 13 Messages in 5 Topics,
Noah Lavine
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@x - 13 Messages in 5 Topics,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@x - 13 Messages in 5 Topics,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@x - 13 Messages in 5 Topics,
Noah Lavine
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@x - 13 Messages in 5 Topics,
Mark H Weaver
- [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful.,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful.,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful.,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful.,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful.,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful.,
Mark H Weaver
Re: [Scheme-reports] #460 eqv? deliberations,
Mark H Weaver
[Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
Daniel Krueger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
xacc.ide
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?,
Aaron W . Hsu
Re: [Scheme-reports] new wording for eqv?,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] #370 log of zero,
Mark H Weaver
[Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
David A. Wheeler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
David A. Wheeler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
Vassil Nikolov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
Vassil Nikolov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
David A. Wheeler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
John Boyle
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
Aaron W . Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
John Boyle
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
Vassil Nikolov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
Pierpaolo Bernardi
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?",
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] No (bytevector n ...) ?,
Christian Stigen Larsen
[Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand,
Christian Stigen Larsen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand,
John Cowan
- [Scheme-reports] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand),
Aaron W . Hsu
- Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] [Scheme-reports] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand),
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand),
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand),
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand),
Aaron W . Hsu
- Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] [Scheme-reports] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand),
Aaron W . Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand),
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand,
Aaron W . Hsu
[Scheme-reports] Daniel Weinreb,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] <transformer spec> BNF,
Taylan Ulrich B.
[Scheme-reports] Updates to draft 6,
Steve Hafner
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot,
Mark H Weaver
[Scheme-reports] Updated list of latest Scheme releases,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #360: Change syntax of escaped symbols from |...| to #"...",
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #372: Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit),
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #421: #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case have no final delimiter,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #423: The list of cases where `eqv?` returns `#t` does not mention procedures,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #424: Add write-string procedure to (scheme base),
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #430: clarify library loading rules,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #434: List of named characters is incomplete,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #435: Bytevectors should be called u8vectors,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #436: Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #438: Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #439: Bidirectional ports and port-open?,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #440: Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #453: The denotational semantics,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] set! and imported identifiers,
Marc Feeley
Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot,
Takashi Kato
[Scheme-reports] editorial: 2-argument log function,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7,
Takashi Kato
[Scheme-reports] Comment on R7RS draft 7,
Anders Östlund
[Scheme-reports] editorial: missing index entry and cross-reference for import,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] the features function,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] Missing #,
Takashi Kato
[Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted,
Takashi Kato
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Mark H Weaver
- [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Vassil Nikolov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Marijn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Comment on draft 7 regarding <non-digit>,
David Adler
[Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy?,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages.,
Arthur Smyles
[Scheme-reports] Test suite,
Helmut Eller
[Scheme-reports] REPL,
Helmut Eller
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Helmut Eller
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Helmut Eller
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Helmut Eller
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Alex Shinn
- [Scheme-reports] equal?,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] equal?,
Jim Rees
- Re: [Scheme-reports] equal?,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] equal?,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] equal?,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Shiro Kawai
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Helmut Eller
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
John Cowan
- Message not available
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
John Cowan
- Message not available
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Marc Feeley
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Helmut Eller
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Helmut Eller
- Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL,
Stefan Edwards
[Scheme-reports] Beta reduction,
Helmut Eller
[Scheme-reports] Name supported?,
Alan Watson
[Scheme-reports] Signaled errors need not raise error objects,
Alan Watson
[Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading,
Helmut Eller
[Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination,
Per Bothner
Re: [Scheme-reports] Literal string not quoted speech,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] Suggestion to put display and newline in the same library,
Christian Stigen Larsen
[Scheme-reports] let*-values' definition,
Jean-Michel HUFFLEN
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #423: When does eqv? return #t for procedures?,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #424: Add write-string procedure to (scheme base),
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #430: clarify library loading rules,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #434: List of named characters is incomplete,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #438 (also known as #437): Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #439: Bidirectional ports and port-open?,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #440: Write procedure is not backwards compatible,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #455 (also known as #454): What is a dynamic environment?,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #456: Adoption of R6RS,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS,
Mark H Weaver
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS,
Mark H Weaver
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comments to R7RS-small draft,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] Inexact numbers and `eqv?`: the post I didn't want to make,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] More editorial comments,
Alan Watson
[Scheme-reports] Problems with the 9th ballot,
Mark H Weaver
[Scheme-reports] John Cowan votes for `r6rs` (operational equivalence),
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Formal definitions [con'd],
Jean-Michel HUFFLEN
[Scheme-reports] Comments on R7RS, draft 7,
Steve Hafner
[Scheme-reports] R7RS draft 8 available,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] confusing example in 6.11. Exceptions,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] possible error in specification of guard,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Sascha Ziemann
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Sascha Ziemann
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
leppie
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
leppie
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
leppie
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
leppie
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Mark H Weaver
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Vassil Nikolov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0,
Mark H Weaver
[Scheme-reports] Tracking change in the Scheme reports,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Implied equality,
Biep
[Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-n.pdf raw source text?,
Joseph Wayne Norton
[Scheme-reports] Overview of R7RS-small,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Scheme r7rs syntax described by ABNF,
Joseph Wayne Norton
[Scheme-reports] Location of definitions inside libraries,
Christian Stigen Larsen
[Scheme-reports] Return value for unmatched cond-expand,
Christian Stigen Larsen
[Scheme-reports] Missing parenthesis in bytevector-u8-set! example code,
Justin Ethier
[Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?,
Daniel Villeneuve
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?,
Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Message not available
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?,
Aaron W. Hsu
[Scheme-reports] discrepancies in formal library syntax: begin and include-library-declarations,
Daniel Villeneuve
[Scheme-reports] equivalent rewrite of a sequence of (syntax) definitions?,
Daniel Villeneuve
[Scheme-reports] notes and thoughts on r7rs draft 8,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] file-error?, read-error?, and specificity of error objects,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] "the result is unspecified" vs "unspecified values",
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 1.3.3 Entry conventions,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 1.3.5 Naming conventions,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 2.1 Identifiers,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 4.1.2 Literal expressions,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 4.1.7 Inclusion,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Noah Lavine
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Noah Lavine
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless,
Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless,
Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless,
Jussi Piitulainen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless,
Peter Bex
[Scheme-reports] libraries, cond-expand, begin, and expressions vs definitions,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] "letrec" entry heading,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] "force", "parameterize" implementation notes,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] `guard' is crazy,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] ` , and ,@,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 4.3 Macros,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 5. Program Structure,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 5.6 Libraries,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 6.1 Equivalence predicates; 6.2 Numbers,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] string->utf8,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 6.10 Control Structures,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] 6.13 I/O,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] 6.14 System interface,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] "Language Changes",
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] Issues with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.1 <symbol element>,
David A. Wheeler
[Scheme-reports] suggestion for R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.7 <library name part>,
Joseph Wayne Norton
[Scheme-reports] issue with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.7 <comment>,
Joseph Wayne Norton
[Scheme-reports] Typos with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.6 <def formals> and <definition> ?,
ノートン ジョーセフ ウェイ ン
[Scheme-reports] question with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.6 <definition> and 7.1.7 <library declaration>,
ノートン ジョーセフ ウェイ ン
[Scheme-reports] Useless ambiguities in number specification, section 7.1.1,
David A. Wheeler
[Scheme-reports] Question regarding R7RS draft 8 regarding section 1.3.3 Entry format,
ノートン ジョーセフ ウェイ ン
[Scheme-reports] Immutable environments?,
Vincent Manis
[Scheme-reports] Language changes section of the latest draft,
Jeronimo Pellegrini
[Scheme-reports] 9th draft of R7RS-small released,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Promises that force themselves,
Alan Manuel Gloria
[Scheme-reports] R7RS-large library proposal: Pure Delayed Evaluation,
Alan Manuel Gloria
[Scheme-reports] How about relaxing a dot notation restriction?,
Sascha Ziemann
[Scheme-reports] R7RS - questions concerning variable definitions and binding constructs,
ノートン ジョーセフ ウェイ ン
[Scheme-reports] IO operations and random access,
Paul Pereira
[Scheme-reports] About the behavior of continuation in top-level begin form,
張書瀚
[Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small,
William D Clinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Jay Freeman
- [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Eli Barzilay
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Daniel Villeneuve
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Jussi Piitulainen
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Grant Rettke
- [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Jeronimo Pellegrini
- [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Ivan Raikov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Jim Wise
- [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small,
J Altfas
- [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Emmanuel Medernach
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Sam TH
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small,
John David Stone
- [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Shiro Kawai
- [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for r7rs-small,
Bill Schottstaedt
- [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Takashi Kato
- [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Per Bothner
- [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small,
OKUMURA Yuki
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Jonathan Rees
- [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small,
David Banks
- [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Arthur Smyles
- [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Steven Ganz
- [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for r7rs-small,
John Cowan
- [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Göran Weinholt
- [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Christian Stigen Larsen
- [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Sven Hartrumpf
- [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Marco Benelli
- Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Jean-Michel HUFFLEN
- [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small,
John Boyle
- [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Mario Domenech Goulart
- [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small,
will
- [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Arthur Maciel
[Scheme-reports] thanks to everyone who's contributed so far,
William D Clinger
[Scheme-reports] R7RS WG1 ratification vote: Andy Wingo,
Andy Wingo
[Scheme-reports] Fwd: ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Sam TH
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] ratification vote for R7RS-small,
Michael Sperber
[Scheme-reports] R7RS-small draft 9 page 25 typo?,
Taylan Ulrich B.
[Scheme-reports] Fwd: Ratification vote for R7RS-small,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] New PlebisciteIndex page,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Plebiscite Vote: Aaron W. Hsu (yes),
Aaron W . Hsu
[Scheme-reports] [felix@x: Fw: ratification vote for R7RS-small],
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] R7RS syntax object questions,
Stephen Lewis
[Scheme-reports] R7RS draft #9 - copy-n-paste error for section 6.7 Strings,
Joseph Wayne Norton
[Scheme-reports] Proposed revision of WG2's charter,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS,
David Krentzlin
[Scheme-reports] Fwd: R7RS,
Arthur A. Gleckler
[Scheme-reports] Mailing to the list,
Biep
[Scheme-reports] [lucier@x: Fwd: vote],
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] ratification vote for r7rs-small,
gjs
[Scheme-reports] Reverting to R5RS semantics of procedure identity,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] [moritz@x: R7RS-small ratification vote],
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] [alexander.shendi@x: R7RS ballot],
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS Small,
Vincent Manis
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS Small,
Mikael
- [Scheme-reports] library at file level (was: Ratification vote for R7RS Small),
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level (was: Ratification vote for R7RS Small),
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level (was: Ratification vote for R7RS Small),
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level (was: Ratification vote for R7RS Small),
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level,
Taylan Ulrich B.
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level,
Aaron W. Hsu
- Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] extension of voting period,
will
[Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #2: additional character names,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping,
will
[Scheme-reports] Why define-library requires a explicit begin form?,
張書瀚
[Scheme-reports] Ratification vote on R7RS-small,
Alan Watson
[Scheme-reports] New PlebisciteObjections page,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Indentation (was: Ratification vote for R7RS Small),
Alexey Radul
[Scheme-reports] R7RS WG1 ratification vote: Christian Kellermann,
Christian Kellermann
[Scheme-reports] [mail@x: R7RS-small ratification vote],
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] 9th draft of R7RS-small (ratification vote),
Juergen Lorenz
[Scheme-reports] [mikemon@x: R7RS-small ratification vote],
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] r7rs small ratification vote,
Felix Klock
[Scheme-reports] [tara@x: Vote for R7RS-Small],
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Vote for R7RS-Small,
Stephen Lewis
[Scheme-reports] libraries,
Michael Montague
[Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Evan Hanson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Vassil Nikolov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Vassil Nikolov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Vassil Nikolov
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Taylan Ulrich B.
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Alexey Radul
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Alexey Radul
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Biep
[Scheme-reports] R7RS ratification vote,
Kevin Wortman
[Scheme-reports] Two Informal Comments on r7rs Small, draft 9,
Jay Sulzberger
[Scheme-reports] 9th draft of R/RS-small (ratification vote),
Juergen Lorenz
Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] NinthDraftEditorialChanges,
Arthur A. Gleckler
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Post-plebiscite issues,
Vincent Manis
[Scheme-reports] ADMIN: open posting on the WG2 mailing list begins,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] [pierarda@x: Fwd: Ratification R7RS],
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] voting has ended,
will
[Scheme-reports] Unhygienic macros?,
Sanel Zukan
[Scheme-reports] Question regarding interaction between new syntax-rules extensions,
Peter Bex
[Scheme-reports] Description of self-evaluation is a bit too terse,
Peter Bex
Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Updated sets pre-SRFI and implementation,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals,
Alexey Radul
[Scheme-reports] Steering Committee requests one more draft of the R7RS small language document,
will
[Scheme-reports] Call for editorial assistance,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
Ray Dillinger
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
will
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
Alan Watson
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
Shiro Kawai
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
Taylan Ulrich B.
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
William D Clinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
William D Clinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
will
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
will
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
will
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
will
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
will
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
will
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
will
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
will
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 41, Issue 4,
Gerald Jay Sussman
Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedure equivalence: the last debate,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Procedure equivalence: the last debate,
will
[Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9),
Daniel Villeneuve
[Scheme-reports] Fwd: Re: file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9),
Daniel Villeneuve
[Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] Top-level cond-expand for backwards compatibility,
Christian Stigen Larsen
[Scheme-reports] Call for vote: SRFI 111, Boxes,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language,
Grant Rettke
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language,
Kevin Wortman
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language,
Grant Rettke
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language,
Kevin Wortman
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language,
Grant Rettke
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language,
Alex Shinn
Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators,
Andrew Robbins
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators,
Kevin Wortman
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators,
Noah Lavine
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators,
Alexey Radul
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators,
Marijn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators,
Ray Dillinger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators,
Alexey Radul
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators,
Marijn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators,
Roderic Morris
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators,
Kevin Wortman
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators,
Alexey Radul
- Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators,
Kevin Wortman
[Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through,
Chris Hanson
[Scheme-reports] SRFI 111, Boxes, added to R7RS-large,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Call for vote: SRFI 112, Environment inquiry,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] ADMIN: Aborting vote on SRFI-112 as part of R7RS-large,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Is R6RS in the public domain?,
Musical Notation
[Scheme-reports] When will R7RS be released?,
Musical Notation
[Scheme-reports] Licensing of R7RS,
Musical Notation
[Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant,
Musical Notation
[Scheme-reports] You all don't need to do anything to change the licensing,
Musical Notation
[Scheme-reports] We can stop talking about licensing now,
Musical Notation
[Scheme-reports] R7RS final (draft #10?) - question for section 4.3.2 Pattern language and 7.1.5 Transformers,
Joseph Wayne Norton
[Scheme-reports] boolean=?,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] I just signed “Speaker of the Lok Sabha Shrimati Meira Kumar: Send the RTI (Amendment) Bill, 2013 to a Standing Committee/Select Committee ”,
Nataraj S Narayan
[Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite?,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] R7RS final draft - bug report for section 7.3 Derived expression types,
Joseph Wayne Norton
[Scheme-reports] result of (infinite? +nan.0+inf.0i),
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] Typo in Description for (string-copy!) in R7RS Draft 9,
Ryan Cumming
[Scheme-reports] Closing SRFI-112 and voting on it for R7RS-large,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Closing SRFI-112 and voting on it for R7RS-large,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] command-line and invocation manner,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] #,
Michael Montague
[Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape,
Alex Shinn
- Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape,
Jay Sulzberger
- Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape,
Vassil Nikolov
[Scheme-reports] #\@ starting an identifiers,
Michael Montague
[Scheme-reports] ANN: SRFI 155: Scheme Regular Expressions,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] programs and cond-expand,
Michael Montague
[Scheme-reports] loading libraries,
Michael Montague
[Scheme-reports] Is bytevector a token?,
Yuichi Nishiwaki
[Scheme-reports] Bibliography: SRFI-4 URI is wrong,
Peter Bex
[Scheme-reports] The TeX source code of Scheme reports,
Kalinni Gorzkis
[Scheme-reports] R7RS-small draft ratified by Steering Committee,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] grammar of numbers,
Michael Montague
[Scheme-reports] Common Lisp-like read macros in Scheme,
musicdenotation
[Scheme-reports] Proposal to add fexprs,
Kalinni Gorzkis
[Scheme-reports] Question about R6RS standard-{input, output, error}-port,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] Erratum for letrec* definition,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum?,
Yuichi Nishiwaki
[Scheme-reports] New versions of SRFI 113 and 114,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] An erratum in section 5.3.3?,
Yuichi Nishiwaki
[Scheme-reports] <body> of let-syntax,
Takashi Kato
[Scheme-reports] Import declarations in programs,
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
Re: [Scheme-reports] Replacing two identifiers with the same in an import declaration,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Libraries that are referenced more than once,
Alex Shinn
[Scheme-reports] Identifiers imported "by reference or value"?,
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
[Scheme-reports] eq? and eqv? for records,
Sascha Ziemann
[Scheme-reports] Hard to find the final R7RS-small PDF,
Christian Stigen Larsen
[Scheme-reports] TAI epoch,
Shiro Kawai
Re: [Scheme-reports] Pattern matching and list comprehensions,
Denis Trapeznikoff
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Installing the floor of the R7RS-large numeric tower,
Kevin Wortman
Re: [Scheme-reports] numeric tower,
Bill Schottstaedt
Re: [Scheme-reports] Looking for collaborators to develop a formally verified implementation for R7RS (small) using Coq.,
Perry E. Metzger
Re: [Scheme-reports] Installing the floor of the R7RS-large numeric tower,
Christian Stigen Larsen
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
John Cowan
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
Christian Stigen Larsen
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
Andy Wingo
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
Arthur A. Gleckler
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
Per Bothner
- [Scheme-reports] Proposed R7RS-large library declarations,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
Sascha Ziemann
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
Alaric Snell-Pym
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
Peter Bex
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
John Cowan
- [Scheme-reports] dealing with non-BMP characters [was: Reformulated numeric-tower ballot],
Per Bothner
- Re: [Scheme-reports] dealing with non-BMP characters [was: Reformulated numeric-tower ballot],
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
xacc.ide
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
John Cowan
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
xacc.ide
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot,
xacc.ide
[Scheme-reports] My vote,
Gerald Jay Sussman
Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] DISCUSSION/VOTE: The character tower,
Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer
Re: [Scheme-reports] DISCUSSION/VOTE: The character tower,
Bear
[Scheme-reports] Orthogonality in the numeric tower,
Biep
[Scheme-reports] The error of the number of make-promise's arguments,
Wataru Nakanishi
[Scheme-reports] R7RS license,
musicdenotation
[Scheme-reports] The `lookup` function,
musicdenotation
Re: [Scheme-reports] Agreement to license,
Jonathan Rees
Re: [Scheme-reports] mutable unicode strings,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] using let-syntax at case-lambda definition,
Yuichi Nishiwaki
Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-small document available as HTML?,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Gauche joins the ranks of the R7RS implementations,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Gauche joins the ranks of the R7RS implementations,
Justin Ethier
[Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists,
Michael Montague
Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists,
Michael Montague
[Scheme-reports] editorial awkwardness for syntax-rules pattern-matching,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] ccil.org down but immutable lists SRFI still available,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] Immutable list SRFI updated,
Kevin Wortman
[Scheme-reports] An R5RS erratum that persisted into R7RS,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] exact-closed in features list,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] 'else' auxiliary syntax,
Takashi Kato
[Scheme-reports] syntax-rules is not exported from (scheme r5rs),
Takashi Kato
[Scheme-reports] Errors (?) in 7.2, Formal Semantics,
William Cushing
[Scheme-reports] FYI - Kawa 2.0 supports r7rs,
Per Bothner
[Scheme-reports] Requesting early review of a character sequence library,
John Cowan
Re: [Scheme-reports] split-string,
John Cowan
[Scheme-reports] Regarding the String & Character Spans Library,
Jesse Towner
[Scheme-reports] something's wrong with R7RS (small) erratum 5,
William D Clinger
[Scheme-reports] Possible error in latest available draft of R7RS,
Thorben Hasenpusch
Mail converted by MHonArc