[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
Peter Bex scripsit:
> Why not allows implementations to choose whether they want to be
> backwards compatible in this way?
That was proposed but failed to pass.
> If # is not specified in the standard it can still be supported by
> individual implementations, right?
John Cowan cowan@x http://ccil.org/~cowan
If he has seen farther than others,
it is because he is standing on a stack of dwarves.
--Mike Champion, describing Tim Berners-Lee (adapted)
Scheme-reports mailing list