Re: [Scheme-reports] Problems with the 9th ballot

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Mark H Weaver scripsit:

> This history is a crock.

History frequently is bunk, yes.  But it doesn't matter!  The important
points are that the issue is being revoted _de novo_, and that the only
options on the ballot are ones that treat IEEE and non-IEEE numbers
consistently.  Ding, dong, the Wicked Witch is dead!

Granted, write-in votes are possible.  But I've licked my finger and
held it up to the air, and so I don't need a weatherman to see which
way the wind blows.

(The .sig below chosen at random, as always.  But it's singularly
appropriate this time, I think.)

-- 
I am expressing my opinion.  When my            John Cowan
honorable and gallant friend is called,         cowan@x
he will express his opinion.  This is           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
the process which we call Debate.                   --Winston Churchill

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports