[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Problems with the 9th ballot
Mark H Weaver scripsit:
> This history is a crock.
History frequently is bunk, yes. But it doesn't matter! The important
points are that the issue is being revoted _de novo_, and that the only
options on the ballot are ones that treat IEEE and non-IEEE numbers
consistently. Ding, dong, the Wicked Witch is dead!
Granted, write-in votes are possible. But I've licked my finger and
held it up to the air, and so I don't need a weatherman to see which
way the wind blows.
(The .sig below chosen at random, as always. But it's singularly
appropriate this time, I think.)
I am expressing my opinion. When my John Cowan
honorable and gallant friend is called, cowan@x
he will express his opinion. This is http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
the process which we call Debate. --Winston Churchill
Scheme-reports mailing list