[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] define-record-type queries

Aaron W. Hsu scripsit:

> *sigh* It appears that you are right here. On the other hand, I would  
> argue that you can't possibly justify a symbolic semantics here because of  
> this very situation: it's just incorrect. 

SRFI 9 indeed speaks of identifiers throughout, never of symbols.

John Cowan            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan     cowan@x
Uneasy lies the head that wears the Editor's hat! --Eddie Foirbeis Climo

Scheme-reports mailing list