[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #435: Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 5:33 AM, John Cowan <cowan@x> wrote:
> This is a Formal Response to Formal Comment #435:
> Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
> Since the WG had already rejected this alternative, and since no new
> arguments were provided in the Formal Comment, the editors rejected this
> proposal without another ballot.
It would have been consistent with our process not
to bring this to a second vote, however out of respect
to the commenter as a formal editor we did in fact
vote on this a second time, emphasizing your arguments.
Bytevector won by a smaller margin, but still won.
Scheme-reports mailing list