Re: [Scheme-reports] Language changes section of the latest draft

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Jeronimo Pellegrini scripsit:

> And actually, some of the points have a small rationale (like this one),
> but others don't (like the removal of the transcript-* procedures).

We don't really know the rationale for the latter: the WG voted to remove
them without any real discussion of the point.

-- 
John Cowan      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan      cowan@x
Be yourself.  Especially do not feign a working knowledge of RDF where
no such knowledge exists.  Neither be cynical about RELAX NG; for in
the face of all aridity and disenchantment in the world of markup,
James Clark is as perennial as the grass.  --DeXiderata, Sean McGrath

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports