Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes

[Grant Rettke <grettke@x>]

r7rs-core and r7rs-common

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Denis Washington <denisw@x> wrote:
> Am 31.08.2011 00:43, schrieb Arthur A. Gleckler:
>> "r7rs-big" and "r7rs-small" are perfectly good names.
>
> In my opinion, they are awful. What should the reports be named, then?
> "The Small Report on [...] Scheme" and "The Big Report on [...] Scheme"?
> Sounds like they are differently detailed reports on the same thing,
> which is clearly not the case.
>
> I think we need something better.
>
> Regards,
> Denis
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scheme-reports mailing list
> Scheme-reports@x
> http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
>



-- 
http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/
ACM, AMA, COG, IEEE

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports