Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? and eqv? for records

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer scripsit:

> If anything, we should special case them to mention that immutable
> records might share structure even when returned from distinct calls to
> a constructor, akin to how literals can share structure because they're
> immutable.

I would rather have a separate set of types for immutable records in the
large language.

-- 
Not to perambulate                 John Cowan <cowan@x>
    the corridors                  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
during the hours of repose
    in the boots of ascension.       --Sign in Austrian ski-resort hotel

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports