On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 11:43 +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:I must object to this. Firstly, I use raise-continuable all the time in
> I have two problems with it. One is that very few Schemers have used
> it. I asked on this list once who had used it, and no one replied in
> the affirmative. Therefore it is not "core" enough to go into a
> "small" r7rs.
various things that I do, and most of the exception systems that I have
seen in Scheme have some equivalent form to this form. Moreover, the
distinction between raise and raise-continuable is one that I have found
useful in practice.
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports