[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism

On Fri, 14 Oct 2011, John Cowan wrote:

> Andre van Tonder scripsit:
> I didn't put any OO packages on the ballot for fear of going down a
> rathole; people often feel strongly about specific OO packages, or about
> not having one.

You're right about that ;)

I feel quite strongly that OO is for languages without first class functions 
(or for programmers who do not understand first class functions, who shouldn't 
be using Scheme anyway).  Most OO languages in fact need OO only because they 
were purposely hobbled in this department.


Scheme-reports mailing list