Re: [Scheme-reports] grammar of numbers

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Vassil Nikolov scripsit:

> By the way, does Scheme have the notion of a potnum (or did it in
> the past)?

No.  But since Scheme has no standard way for programmers to alter the
lexical syntax, it doesn't matter very much.  Implementations are free
to extend the syntax of numbers, extend the syntax of identifiers,
or do neither.

-- 
Even a refrigerator can conform to the XML      John Cowan
Infoset, as long as it has a door sticker       cowan@x
saying "No information items inside".           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --Eve Maler

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports