Mail Index

• Thread Index

• [Scheme-reports] announcement of scheme-reports.org
  • From: Jonathan Rees <jar@x>
• [Scheme-reports] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <aag@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters
  • From: Brian Harvey <bh@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters
  • From: Peter Michaux <petermichaux@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Comments on revised WG1 charter
  • From: Brian Harvey <bh@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on revised WG1 charter
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on revised WG1 charter
  • From: Brian Harvey <bh@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on revised WG1 charter
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on revised WG1 charter
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on revised WG1 charter
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on revised WG1 charter
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on revised WG1 charter
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on revised WG1 charter
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on revised WG1 charter
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Fwd: [plt-scheme] [ANN] Scheme Language Working Groups 1 and 2 draft charters
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Comments on revised WG1 charter
  • From: will@x
• [Scheme-reports] contact with working groups
  • From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] contact with working groups
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: [r6rs-discuss] Volunteering for Scheme language standardization working groups ***deadline January 8***
  • From: Jonathan Rees <jar@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Trying to volunteer
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• [Scheme-reports] working group 1 public resources
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] working group 1 public resources
  • From: Jonathan Rees <jar@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] working group 1 public resources
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Keywords
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• [Scheme-reports] For WG1: Byte-vector literal syntax
  • From: Tony Garnock-Jones <tonygarnockjones@x>
• [Scheme-reports] make-encapsulated-type
  • From: "Bill Schottstaedt" <bil@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: Brian Harvey <bh@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: David Rush <kumoyuki@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: Brian Harvey <bh@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: Brian Harvey <bh@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: Anton van Straaten <anton@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: Brian Harvey <bh@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: David Rush <kumoyuki@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: David Rush <kumoyuki@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: Brian Harvey <bh@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: David Rush <kumoyuki@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: "Benjamin L. Russell" <dekudekuplex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: "Benjamin L. Russell" <dekudekuplex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: Brian Harvey <bh@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: Brian Harvey <bh@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: "Benjamin L. Russell" <dekudekuplex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: Brian Harvey <bh@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable Pairs
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Haskell's incremental approach
  • From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Haskell's incremental approach
  • From: Brian Harvey <bh@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Haskell's incremental approach
  • From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
• [Scheme-reports] [ANN] LAST CHANCE TO REGISTER ONLINE for 2010 Workshop on Scheme and Functional Programming
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• [Scheme-reports] No procedure to ask the current time?
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] No procedure to ask the current time?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] No procedure to ask the current time?
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] No procedure to ask the current time?
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] No procedure to ask the current time?
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] No procedure to ask the current time?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] No procedure to ask the current time?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Changing bits of bytes in byte vectors?
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Changing bits of bytes in byte vectors?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] No procedure to ask the current time?
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] No procedure to ask the current time?
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] No procedure to ask the current time?
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] No procedure to ask the current time?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] No procedure to ask the current time?
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• [Scheme-reports] New features in WG1 Scheme
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
  • From: "Larry D. Lee jr." <llee@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
  • From: "Larry D. Lee jr." <llee@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] scheme - mysql and Gui
  • From: Nataraj S Narayan <natarajsn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] randomness in wg1
  • From: Marco Benelli <mbenelli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] randomness in wg1
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• [Scheme-reports] New features in WG1 Scheme redux
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: Neil Van Dyke <neil@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: Adrien "Pied" Piérard <axioplase+r6rs@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: Neil Van Dyke <neil@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: Brian Harvey <bh@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: "Christopher Chittleborough" <cchittleborough@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: Faré <fahree@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Taylor R Campbell <campbell+scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Taylor R Campbell <campbell+scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] need to overload (case) for pattern-matching
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Taylor R Campbell <campbell+scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Taylor R Campbell <campbell+scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] LAMBDA and Unicode (Was: Scheme pattern matching & R*RS)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Taylor R Campbell <campbell+scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] freshmen & unicode lambda's
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] match.scm
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Taylor R Campbell <campbell+scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] match.scm
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] match.scm
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] match.scm
  • From: Jim Wise <jwise@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Taylor R Campbell <campbell+scheme@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] match.scm
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Taylor R Campbell <campbell+scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Taylor R Campbell <campbell+scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: case, alternatives, arrows
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: Taylor R Campbell <campbell+scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-posix-second is a disastrous mistake
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Adrien "Pied" Piérard <axioplase+r6rs@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme
  • From: r6rsguy@x
• [Scheme-reports] LAMBDA and Unicode (Was: [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS)
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Jim Wise <jwise@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Jim Wise <jwise@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Bigloo
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Bigloo
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Brian Harvey <bh@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] LAMBDA and Unicode (Was: [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS)
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] LAMBDA and Unicode
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Scheme is NOT spam!
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme as FP assembly language
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Scheme as FP assembly language
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Scheme pattern matching: the case for (case)
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?
  • From: Adrien "Pied" Piérard <axioplase+r6rs@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] case reborn
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] do we need to redefine eqv?
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Numeric towers
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numeric towers
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numeric towers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numeric towers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numeric towers
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numeric towers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numeric towers
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: Adrien "Pied" Piérard <axioplase+r6rs@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
  • From: Adrien "Pied" Piérard <axioplase+r6rs@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: David Rush <kumoyuki@x>
• Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Jim Wise <jwise@x>
• [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Jim Wise <jwise@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: David Rush <kumoyuki@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: David Rush <kumoyuki@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: David Van Horn <dvanhorn@x>
• [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: David Rush <kumoyuki@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [scheme-reports] Scheme pattern matching & R*RS
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Module Directory
  • From: Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module Directory
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module Directory
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module Directory
  • From: Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@x>
• [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: OKUMURA Yuki <mjt@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: OKUMURA Yuki <mjt@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS 1st draft, initial environment and related notions
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 1st draft, initial environment and related notions
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 1st draft, initial environment and related notions
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS 1st draft, parameterize body; guard macro definition
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: OKUMURA Yuki <mjt@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] DELAY AND FORCE
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Regions of imports unspecified
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] DELAY AND FORCE
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Internal syntax definition order problem
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Regions of imports unspecified
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Mutable exports
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Internal syntax definition order problem
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] DELAY AND FORCE
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Internal definition shadowing problems
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] DELAY AND FORCE
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Importing identifier more than once
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] What are regions of toplevel imports?
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] EVAL
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...)
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] COND, CASE, AND, ... macros are buggy
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Buggy definition of BEGIN
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] DELAY AND FORCE
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] DELAY AND FORCE
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Restrictions on internal BEGIN?
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Regions of imports unspecified
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mutable exports
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Toplevel import scoping
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What are regions of toplevel imports?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EVAL
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...)
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] COND, CASE, AND, ... macros are buggy
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Toplevel import scoping
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...)
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Importing identifier more than once
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Buggy definition of BEGIN
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EVAL
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Restrictions on internal BEGIN?
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...)
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...)
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Internal syntax definition order problem
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Please make internal BEGIN a splicing form
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...)
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Template pattern grammar seems broken
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Rebinding syntactic keywords as variables
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] When ... is a literal
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Rebinding syntactic keywords as variables
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else
  • From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] When ... is a literal
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Redefinition and shadowing in module bodies?
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Shadowing imports at toplevel
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Do record type NAMEs shadow somhow?
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Are record field names bound by a record type def?
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Shadowing imports at toplevel
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Shadowing imports at toplevel
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are record field names bound by a record type def?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Shadowing imports at toplevel
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Please make internal BEGIN a splicing form
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Template pattern grammar seems broken
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Do record type NAMEs shadow somhow?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Please make internal BEGIN a splicing form
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Please make internal BEGIN a splicing form
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Please make internal BEGIN a splicing form
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Error in comment syntax grammar
  • From: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm.tredinnick@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Error in comment syntax grammar
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] char-numeric? and unicode "numeric" property
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] char-numeric? and unicode "numeric" property
  • From: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm.tredinnick@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] char-numeric? and unicode "numeric" property
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
• [Scheme-reports] A couple more typos or ambiguities
  • From: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm.tredinnick@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] A couple more typos or ambiguities
  • From: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm.tredinnick@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Proposing amending char-numeric? definition
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposing amending char-numeric? definition
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposing amending char-numeric? definition
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposing amending char-numeric? definition
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module-level BEGIN is not a BEGIN - please call it something else
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Rebinding syntactic keywords as variables
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Toplevel import scoping
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Toplevel import scoping
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Introduction and additional material
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Redefinition and shadowing in module bodies?
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Redefinition and shadowing in module bodies?
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Introduction and additional material
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Missing description of complex polar form
  • From: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm.tredinnick@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Missing description of complex polar form
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• [Scheme-reports] I/O
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] I/O
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Missing description of complex polar form
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Missing description of complex polar form
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Missing description of complex polar form
  • From: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm.tredinnick@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: Fwd: Missing description of complex polar form
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: Fwd: Missing description of complex polar form
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Re: Fwd: Missing description of complex polar form
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: Fwd: Missing description of complex polar form
  • From: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm.tredinnick@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Missing description of complex polar form
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] I/O
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] I/O
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] I/O
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] I/O
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: I/O
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm.tredinnick@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: Fwd: Missing description of complex polar form
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Missing description of complex polar form
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: Fwd: Missing description of complex polar form
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] I/O redux
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...)
  • From: Andrzej <ndrwrdck@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andrzej <ndrwrdck@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] I/O redux
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...)
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] I/O redux
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] I/O redux
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...)
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...)
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...)
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] I/O redux
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] The SYNTAX-RULES macro phase error
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• [Scheme-reports] The SYNTAX-RULES macro phase error
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andrzej <ndrwrdck@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...)
  • From: Andrzej <ndrwrdck@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andrzej <ndrwrdck@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...)
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...)
  • From: Andrzej <ndrwrdck@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...)
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andrzej <ndrwrdck@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What happened to (UNQUOTE <expression> ...)
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] The SYNTAX-RULES macro phase error
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] The SYNTAX-RULES macro phase error
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] define-record-type queries
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] define-record-type queries
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple returns from map functions?
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple returns from map functions?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] define-record-type queries
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Template pattern grammar seems broken
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple returns from map functions?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Please make internal BEGIN a splicing form
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Please make internal BEGIN a splicing form
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple returns from map functions?
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] inexact->exact and vice versa
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] A couple more typos or ambiguities
  • From: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm.tredinnick@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andrzej <ndrwrdck@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Multiple values in BEGIN
  • From: Ian Price <ianprice90@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Multiple values in BEGIN
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Multiple values in BEGIN
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Multiple values in BEGIN
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Multiple values in BEGIN
  • From: Ian Price <ianprice90@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Multiple values in BEGIN
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Multiple values in BEGIN
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Multiple values in BEGIN
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andrzej <ndrwrdck@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inexact->exact and vice versa
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inexact->exact and vice versa
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andrzej <ndrwrdck@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andrzej <ndrwrdck@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inexact->exact and vice versa
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inexact->exact and vice versa
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inexact->exact and vice versa
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inexact->exact and vice versa
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inexact->exact and vice versa
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inexact->exact and vice versa
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inexact->exact and vice versa
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Character/string case and the unicode module
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Andrzej <ndrwrdck@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Character/string case and the unicode module
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Character/string case and the unicode module
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Character/string case and the unicode module
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Binary and character ports (and an unrelated small issue)
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Binary and character ports (and an unrelated small issue)
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• [Scheme-reports] WG1 Scheme as a language for CS1
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG1 Scheme as a language for CS1
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG1 Scheme as a language for CS1
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Binary and character ports (and an unrelated small issue)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG1 Scheme as a language for CS1
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG1 Scheme as a language for CS1
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG1 Scheme as a language for CS1
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG1 Scheme as a language for CS1
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG1 Scheme as a language for CS1
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG1 Scheme as a language for CS1
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG1 Scheme as a language for CS1
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ANN: first draft of R7RS small language available
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG1 Scheme as a language for CS1
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Sztefan Edwards <saedwards.ecc@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Binary and character ports (and an unrelated small issue)
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Binary and character ports (and an unrelated small issue)
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Internal definition shadowing problems
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG1 Scheme as a language for CS1
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling
  • From: <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Introduction and additional material
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] bodies in case and cond clauses
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] strange language in spec of `and' and `or'
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 4.2.2. binding constructs
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 4.2.3 sequencing
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] organizational comment regarding modules
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 4.2.6 dynamic bindings
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 4.2.8 quasiquotation
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 4.3.2 pattern language
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 5.1 programs
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 5.4 record type definitions
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 5.5.1 module syntax
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 6.1 equivalence predicates
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: Sztefan Edwards <saedwards.ecc@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 6.2 numbers
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: Sztefan Edwards <saedwards.ecc@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 6.3.1 booleans
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Introduction and additional material
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 6.3.2 pairs and lists
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 6.3.3 symbols
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] strange language in spec of `and' and `or'
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 6.3.4 characters
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 6.3.5 strings
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 equivalence predicates
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.2 pairs and lists
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.3 symbols
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.2. binding constructs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] organizational comment regarding modules
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.3 symbols
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] bodies in case and cond clauses
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.6 dynamic bindings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.3.2 pattern language
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.1 booleans
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.4 record type definitions
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.5.1 module syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 equivalence predicates
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.2 pairs and lists
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.4 characters
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 equivalence predicates
  • From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
• [Scheme-reports] return value of (parameter 'new-value)
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 6.5 exceptions
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 6.7.1 ports
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• [Scheme-reports] close-port
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 6.7.4 system interfaces
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 7.1.1 lexical structure
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] features
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] NEWS section
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] well hey that was fun or something!
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Introduction and additional material
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] strange language in spec of `and' and `or'
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.2. binding constructs
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] organizational comment regarding modules
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] bodies in case and cond clauses
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.1 booleans
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.5.1 module syntax
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.4 characters
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] well hey that was fun or something!
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.7.4 system interfaces
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] close-port
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.5 strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.4 characters
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.2 numbers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.4 characters
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] close-port
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.5.1 module syntax
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] bodies in case and cond clauses
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.2. binding constructs
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] bodies in case and cond clauses
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] strange language in spec of `and' and `or'
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] NEWS section
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] NEWS section
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] well hey that was fun or something!
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] close-port
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] close-port
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] return value of (parameter 'new-value)
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] close-port
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] organizational comment regarding modules
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.1 programs
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 7.1.1 lexical structure
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.5 strings
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.7.4 system interfaces
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.7.4 system interfaces
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.3 symbols
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.7.4 system interfaces
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.2 numbers
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.1 programs
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] features
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.7.4 system interfaces
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.5.1 module syntax
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs
  • From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: Pierpaolo Bernardi <olopierpa@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.5.1 module syntax
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs
  • From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.7.4 system interfaces
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs
  • From: Sztefan Edwards <saedwards.ecc@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] close-port
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.5.1 module syntax
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] close-port
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Can records be written and read?
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Can records be written and read?
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Can records be written and read?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] NEWS section
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.2. binding constructs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] features
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.2 numbers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.1 programs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.1 programs
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Can records be written and read?
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.1 programs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.3 sequencing
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.7.1 ports
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 7.1.1 lexical structure
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.2. binding constructs
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 equivalence predicates
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 7.1.1 lexical structure
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Blobs vs. byte vectors (was: 6.4 control features ...)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Blobs vs. byte vectors
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Blobs vs. byte vectors
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] well hey that was fun or something!
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Can records be written and read?
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.4 record type definitions
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] BEGIN-FOR-SYNTAX
  • From: Manuel Simoni <msimoni@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.4 control features: -map and -for-each procedures
  • From: Jim Wise <jwise@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Do record type NAMEs shadow somhow?
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "unspecified values"
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.7. Exception Handling
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Can records be written and read?
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] BEGIN-FOR-SYNTAX
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Texinfo
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: Pierpaolo Bernardi <olopierpa@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: Pierpaolo Bernardi <olopierpa@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: Pierpaolo Bernardi <olopierpa@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Texinfo
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Texinfo
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Texinfo
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Texinfo
  • From: Jim Wise <jwise@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Texinfo
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Multiple values
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Multiple values
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Multiple values
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Jim Wise <jwise@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Jim Wise <jwise@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Sztefan Edwards <saedwards.ecc@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• [Scheme-reports] a call for peace
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] a call for peace
  • From: Jim Wise <jwise@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] a call for peace
  • From: <xacc.ide@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Technical question
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Technical question
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Technical question
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Technical question
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Technical question
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] a call for peace
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Technical question
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values module
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] a call for peace
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Technical question
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Technical question
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Technical question
  • From: Jay Reynolds Freeman <jay_reynolds_freeman@x>
• [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.
  • From: Jay Reynolds Freeman <jay_reynolds_freeman@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Technical question
  • From: Anton van Straaten <anton@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Technical question
  • From: Jay Reynolds Freeman <jay_reynolds_freeman@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Technical question
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] values
  • From: Razvan Rotaru <roti_343@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Technical question
  • From: Anton van Straaten <anton@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] values
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Technical question
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Values and tuples
  • From: Hans Aberg <haberg-1@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Technical question
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] values
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.
  • From: Jay Reynolds Freeman <jay_reynolds_freeman@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.
  • From: Jay Reynolds Freeman <jay_reynolds_freeman@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.
  • From: Jay Reynolds Freeman <jay_reynolds_freeman@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Technical question
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] values
  • From: Razvan Rotaru <roti_343@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] values
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] General comments on the draft WG1 R7 report.
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 6.7.4 load
  • From: Jonathan Kraut <jak76@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.7.4 load
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.7.4 load
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.7.4 load
  • From: Jonathan Kraut <jak76@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions
  • From: Jonathan Kraut <jak76@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.7.4 load
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.7.4 load
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] quasiquote and cycles
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] quasiquote and cycles
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] quasiquote and cycles
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] quasiquote and cycles
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "module" vs. "library"
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Programming languages and implementation strategies
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] WG1/WG2 Scheme naming proposal
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG1/WG2 Scheme naming proposal
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Next draft release date?
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Next draft release date?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Next draft release date?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS small language third draft available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS small language third draft available
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS small language third draft available
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 1
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 2
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 1
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 2
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 1
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• [Scheme-reports] #! as general directive prefix?
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] #! as general directive prefix?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 1
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] #! as general directive prefix?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 1
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 1
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 1
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 1
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 1
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Omission in draft 3
  • From: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm.tredinnick@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Omission in draft 3
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Omission in draft 3
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Omission in draft 3
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] #! as general directive prefix?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] #! as general directive prefix?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 4
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 4
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 4
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] Omission in draft 3
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 4
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] Omission in draft 3
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 4
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 4
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 4
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 4
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 4
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 4
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 4
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 4
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 (2)
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro <raffaelcavallaro@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro <raffaelcavallaro@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 (2)
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?
  • From: Jonáš Vidra <vidra.jonas@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: Jim Wise <jwise@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
• [Scheme-reports] (command-line) needs to specify argv[0] behavior
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: Jim Wise <jwise@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ticket #214 "string/symbol escape sequence confusing"
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] current-XXX-port is binary?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-XXX-port is binary?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] current-XXX-port is binary?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: Raffael Cavallaro <raffaelcavallaro@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ticket #214 "string/symbol escape sequence confusing"
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: Jim Wise <jwise@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ticket #214 "string/symbol escape sequence confusing"
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ticket #214 "string/symbol escape sequence confusing"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ticket for extended "Overview of Scheme" chapter
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ticket for extended "Overview of Scheme" chapter
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Small comments on draft 3
  • From: Sven Hartrumpf <hartrumpf@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] (command-line) needs to specify argv[0] behavior
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 (2)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Small comments on draft 3
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Dividing Section 6.3
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Dividing Section 6.3
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Dividing Section 6.3
  • From: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm.tredinnick@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Dividing Section 6.3
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Dividing Section 6.3
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Dividing Section 6.3
  • From: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm.tredinnick@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Small comments on draft 3
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Dividing Section 6.3
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Small comments on draft 3
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm.tredinnick@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] exception handling
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] exception handling
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Small comments on draft 3
  • From: Sven Hartrumpf <hartrumpf@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] exception handling
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] exception handling
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Small comments on draft 3
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Rational? and real? predicates
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Rational? and real? predicates
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal syntax versus text
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] exception handling
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "include" filename resolution
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?
  • From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors?
  • From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors?
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors?
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors?
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Vincent St-Amour <stamourv@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] exception handling
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal syntax versus text
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Vincent St-Amour <stamourv@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Vincent St-Amour <stamourv@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Vincent St-Amour <stamourv@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Hardcoded identifier names in formal syntax
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Hardcoded identifier names in formal syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Hardcoded identifier names in formal syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Hardcoded identifier names in formal syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] diff between R6RS and the R7RS small language draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Hardcoded identifier names in formal syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Poll: intentions concerning the R7RS "small" language
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] John Cowan's rationales for 4th ballot votes
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Nasal demons in R7RS-small
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Division by zero
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Complex numbers with infinities and NaN
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Complex numbers with infinities and NaN
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Division by zero
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Division by zero
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Nasal demons in R7RS-small
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Arthur Gleckler's rationales for 4th ballo votes
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Padding/placeholders (hashes) in numerical syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] practical matters - CSAN
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Recommendations regarding module filesystem mapping
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"
  • From: "Bill Schottstaedt" <bil@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Recommendations regarding module filesystem mapping
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed compromise on #68 "unspecified value(s)"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] the humble pk
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Is this thing on?
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Is this thing on?
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Is this thing on?
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• [scheme-reports-wg1] distributed repository and call for names
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] distributed repository and call for names
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] distributed repository and call for names
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] distributed repository: README.txt doc as package requirement
  • From: John Gabriele <jmg3000@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] distributed repository: README.txt doc as package requirement
  • From: Ivan Raikov <ivan.g.raikov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: distributed repository: README.txt doc as package requirement
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] distributed repository: README.txt doc as package requirement
  • From: John Gabriele <jmg3000@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: distributed repository: README.txt doc as package requirement
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] distributed repository: README.txt doc as package requirement
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] distributed repository and call for names
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: distributed repository: README.txt doc as package requirement
  • From: John Gabriele <jmg3000@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: distributed repository: README.txt doc as package requirement
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN
  • From: will@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ticket #281 withdrawn
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN
  • From: will@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ballot question #229: EQV? and NaN
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
  • From: <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
  • From: <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
  • From: <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Video of John Cowan's R7RS talk at LispNYC online
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Video of John Cowan's R7RS talk at LispNYC online
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
  • From: Hans Aberg <haberg-1@x>
• [Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism
  • From: Eduardo Cavazos <wayo.cavazos@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] WG2 Scheme and Polymporphism
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Appeal for review help with R7RS draft 4
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Denis Washington <denisw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] initial results of implementor intentions poll
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] initial results of implementor intentions poll
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] initial results of implementor intentions poll
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] initial results of implementor intentions poll
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Dedication of R7RS-small
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Dedication of R7RS-small
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Are generated toplevel definitions secret?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI?
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• [Scheme-reports] How do distributions verify conformance to the standard?
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• [scheme-reports-wg1]
  • From: "Benjamin L. Russell" <dekudekuplex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI?
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] How do distributions verify conformance to the standard?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] How do distributions verify conformance to the standard?
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI?
  • From: Stefan Edwards <saedwards.ecc@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI?
  • From: David Banks <amoebae@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI?
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI?
  • From: David Banks <amoebae@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] How do distributions verify conformance to the standard?
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS small in R6RS library
  • From: OKUMURA Yuki <mjt@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS small in R6RS library
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS small in R6RS library
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS small in R6RS library
  • From: OKUMURA Yuki <mjt@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS small in R6RS library
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS small in R6RS library
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] draft 5 available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] draft 5 available
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] draft 5 available
  • From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@x>
• [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] draft 5 available
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] draft 5 available
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] draft 5 available
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] draft 5 available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] draft 5 available
  • From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@x>
• [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name?
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Can a library keep state?
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Can a library keep state?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name?
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name?
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name?
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name?
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name?
  • From: Stefan Edwards <saedwards.ecc@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name?
  • From: Stefan Edwards <saedwards.ecc@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name?
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level
  • From: Bakul Shah <bakul@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level
  • From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
• [Scheme-reports] return value(s) of load
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] return value(s) of load
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] return value(s) of load
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Standard Feature Identifiers are too low-level
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] return value(s) of load
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] return value(s) of load
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] return value(s) of load
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] return value(s) of load
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] bytevector/string/vector comments
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Module Versioning
  • From: Roderic Morris <roderyc@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module Versioning
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Module Versioning
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Three really picky points
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Two issues regarding I/O
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: fresh empty strings
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: fresh empty strings
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Two issues regarding I/O
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Two issues regarding I/O
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Two issues regarding I/O
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: fresh empty strings
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Two issues regarding I/O
  • From: <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Two issues regarding I/O
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: fresh empty strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: fresh empty strings
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: fresh empty strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: fresh empty strings
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] searching for libraries
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] searching for libraries
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] searching for libraries
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS public comment period
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-steering] [Scheme-reports] R7RS public comment period
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Hex Typo
  • From: Andrew Robbins <andjrob@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Hex Typo
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] bytevector-copy-partial, bytevector-copy-partial! thinko
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] bytevector-copy-partial, bytevector-copy-partial! thinko
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] multiple NaN values
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Hex Typo
  • From: Andrew Robbins <andjrob@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple NaN values
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Hex Typo
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple NaN values
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple NaN values
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple NaN values
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple NaN values
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple NaN values
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple NaN values
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple NaN values
  • From: "Bill Schottstaedt" <bil@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple NaN values
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple NaN values
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple NaN values
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Typo in Formal Semantics
  • From: OOHASHI Daichi <leque@x>
• [Scheme-reports] comments on draft 6: Libraries and Relationship of small/large lang
  • From: Kun Liang <liangkun42@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] comments on draft 6: Libraries and Relationship of small/large lang
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Typo in Formal Semantics
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Vitaly Magerya <vmagerya@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists
  • From: Stephen Leach <sfkleach@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Manuel Simoni <msimoni@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Equality of records
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Equality of records
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Equality of records
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Equality of records
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Equality of records
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Query - Pairs and Lists
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Centered Division
  • From: Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI.
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI.
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Arthur Smyles <atsmyles@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Arthur Smyles <atsmyles@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Andrew Robbins <andjrob@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Arthur Smyles <atsmyles@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: Marijn <hkBst@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Symbol escapes - clarification
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI.
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI.
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI.
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI.
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well..
  • From: Biep <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well..
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Exceptions needs examples
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Omit warning about exact fractions when asked for an inexact value
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well..
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers?
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers?
  • From: Andrew Robbins <andjrob@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers?
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers?
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Mixed exactness in complex numbers?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] The history of EQV? on numbers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] The history of EQV? on numbers
  • From: Bradley Lucier <lucier@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well..
  • From: Biep <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Just a load of.. well..
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Rounding procedures with inf/nan
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Rounding procedures with inf/nan
  • From: <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Rounding procedures with inf/nan
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
  • From: quad <quad@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ref cells
  • From: Biep <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
  • From: Andrew Robbins <andjrob@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
  • From: Stefan Edwards <saedwards.ecc@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
  • From: Andrew Robbins <andjrob@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
  • From: Stefan Edwards <saedwards.ecc@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
  • From: quad <quad@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
  • From: quad <quad@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
  • From: Stefan Edwards <saedwards.ecc@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ref cells
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
  • From: Andrew Robbins <andjrob@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal for New Complex Number Syntax
  • From: Stefan Edwards <saedwards.ecc@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit)
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit)
  • From: Stefan Edwards <saedwards.ecc@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit)
  • From: Stefan Edwards <saedwards.ecc@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit)
  • From: Stefan Edwards <saedwards.ecc@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit)
  • From: Stefan Edwards <saedwards.ecc@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] (exit (error message obj ...)) should guarantee a failure exit code as understood by the local OS.
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] (exit (error message obj ...)) should guarantee a failure exit code as understood by the local OS.
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bitwise operations on bytes
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] fifth ballot results are in
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] command-line
  • From: "Bill Schottstaedt" <bil@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
  • From: "Bill Schottstaedt" <bil@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
  • From: "Bill Schottstaedt" <bil@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
  • From: Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: The epoch of current-second should be 1970-01-01 00:00:00 TAI.
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
  • From: Aleksej Saushev <asau@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Blowing off the R5RS names QUOTIENT, REMAINDER, and MODULO
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Blowing off the R5RS names QUOTIENT, REMAINDER, and MODULO
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Unintended consequences of #319
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Unintended consequences of #319
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319
  • From: <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Unintended consequences of #319
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• [Scheme-reports] sdfl exponent markers (was: Re: Boolean hemlines)
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: "Jeronimo Pellegrini" <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] sdfl exponent markers (was: Re: Boolean hemlines)
  • From: Andrew Robbins <andjrob@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] sdfl exponent markers (was: Re: Boolean hemlines)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: "Jeronimo Pellegrini" <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Vertical bar in the grammar
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Vertical bar in the grammar
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] I/O
  • From: Kristen Eisenberg <kristen.eisenberg@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Vertical bar in the grammar
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Boolean hemlines
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Undelimited identifiers?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Undelimited identifiers?
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Undelimited identifiers?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbolelement>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Cory Burgett <cmburget@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Stephen Leach <sfkleach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: Change syntax of symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Andrew Robbins <andjrob@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers
  • From: Daniel Villeneuve <dvilleneuve@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: John J Foerch <jjfoerch@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers
  • From: Daniel Villeneuve <dvilleneuve@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: Daniel Villeneuve <dvilleneuve@x>
• [Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions
  • From: Daniel Villeneuve <dvilleneuve@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: John J Foerch <jjfoerch@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: John J Foerch <jjfoerch@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: John J Foerch <jjfoerch@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Date/time package
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions
  • From: Daniel Villeneuve <dvilleneuve@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] (dynamic) lexical extensions
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Trac Migration Complete
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Trac Migration Complete
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [scheme-reports-wg1] Trac Migration Complete
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: identifiers looking as numbers
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: circular datum example
  • From: Daniel Villeneuve <dvilleneuve@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: circular datum example
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: Trac Migration Complete
  • From: John Cowan <johnwcowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless
  • From: Daniel Villeneuve <dvilleneuve@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless
  • From: Daniel Villeneuve <dvilleneuve@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-6: examples for when and unless
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Issues with <comment> grammar rule
  • From: Mike Morgan <lordzoner@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues with <comment> grammar rule
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Duncan Steele <steeleduncan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Duncan Steele <steeleduncan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Unsafe optimizations
  • From: Göran Weinholt <goran@x>
• [Scheme-reports] (no subject)
  • From: Johan van der Teems <johan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] (no subject)
  • From: Johan van der Teems <johan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Reminder: public comment period on R7RS-small closes on June 30
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports
  • From: Wolfgang De Meuter <wdmeuter@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal - Internal syntax definitions vs a body with definitions being a letrec*
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?
  • From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Minor things in draft six of small-language report seven
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS Additional material
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: scope of #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case
  • From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case
  • From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: add write-string to (scheme base)
  • From: Arthur Smyles <atsmyles@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: when does eqv? return #t for procedures?
  • From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: add write-string to (scheme base)
  • From: Arthur Smyles <atsmyles@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal - Internal syntax definitions vs a body with definitions being a letrec*
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: add write-string to (scheme base)
  • From: Andrew Robbins <andjrob@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Minor things in draft six of small-language report seven
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: scope of #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: scope of #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: when does eqv? return #t for procedures?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: add write-string to (scheme base)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports
  • From: Wolfgang De Meuter <wdmeuter@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Minor things in draft six of small-language report seven
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] some questions on byte vectors + ports
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: delimiting #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case
  • From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?
  • From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features
  • From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Minor things in draft six of small-language report seven
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features
  • From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?
  • From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Opinion about R7RS
  • From: Jean-Michel HUFFLEN <jmhuffle@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules
  • From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: continuation used when 'guard' re-raises an exception
  • From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• [Scheme-reports] minor editorial changes
  • From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Opinion about R7RS
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Opinion about R7RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features
  • From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Reminder: R7RS public comment period
  • From: William D Clinger <will@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: what is the required behavior of 'lazy'?
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features
  • From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• [Scheme-reports] List of named characters is incomplete
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• [Scheme-reports] digit-value
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Bidirectional ports and port-open?
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• [Scheme-reports] string-fill!
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Sequence to sequence conversion
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] string-fill!
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] minor editorial changes
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Sequence to sequence conversion
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] string-fill!
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] List of named characters is incomplete
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bidirectional ports and port-open?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: Jonathan Rees <jar@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: Jonathan Rees <jar@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features
  • From: Jonathan Rees <jar@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences
  • From: Bakul Shah <bakul@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: continuation used when 'guard' re-raises an exception
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bidirectional ports and port-open?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] List of named characters is incomplete
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bidirectional ports and port-open?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bidirectional ports and port-open?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bidirectional ports and port-open?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Library declarations in included files
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Library declarations in included files
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS Additional material
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Library declarations in included files
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Library declarations in included files
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS Additional material
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Library declarations in included files
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Library declarations in included files
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Sequence to sequence conversion
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS Additional material
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Sequence to sequence conversion
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bidirectional ports and port-open?
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• "J." vs. "Jay"
  • From: Jonathan Rees <jar@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Robert Smith <quad@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules
  • From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Sequence to sequence conversion
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bidirectional ports and port-open?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify the semantics of the dynamic features
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Library declarations in included files
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules
  • From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@x>
• [Scheme-reports] must list-copy handle cycles?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] must list-copy handle cycles?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] char-upcase/char-downcase/char-foldcase should be deprecated
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences
  • From: Michael Lenaghan <michaell@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: clarify library loading rules
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] char-upcase/char-downcase/char-foldcase should be deprecated
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] must list-copy handle cycles?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] drop string-map and string-for-each
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] char-upcase/char-downcase/char-foldcase should be deprecated
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] char-upcase/char-downcase/char-foldcase should be deprecated
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Library declarations in included files
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] drop string-map and string-for-each
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences
  • From: Kun Liang <liangkun42@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Sequence to sequence conversion
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
  • From: Pierpaolo Bernardi <olopierpa@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
  • From: Pierpaolo Bernardi <olopierpa@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Sequence to sequence conversion
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Sequence to sequence conversion
  • From: Andrew Robbins <andjrob@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics
  • From: Michael Sperber <sperber@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: What is a dynamic environment?
  • From: Michael Sperber <sperber@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: Adoption of R6RS
  • From: Michael Sperber <sperber@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: What is a dynamic environment?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: Adoption of R6RS
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] digit-value
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] values [was: Opinion about R7RS]
  • From: Jean-Michel HUFFLEN <jmhuffle@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] (read|write)-char [was Opinion about R7RS]
  • From: Jean-Michel HUFFLEN <jmhuffle@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics
  • From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics
  • From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] (read|write)-char [was Opinion about R7RS]
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Incompatibilities between R5RS and R7RS-small
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Incompatibilities between R5RS and R7RS-small
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Incompatibilities between R5RS and R7RS-small
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics
  • From: will@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics
  • From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal comment: The denotational semantics
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• [Scheme-reports] quasisyntax extension
  • From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe <stefan.itampe@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #360: Change syntax of escaped symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #360: Change syntax of escaped symbols from |<symbol element>*| to #"<string element>*"
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] (read|write)-char [was Opinion about R7RS]
  • From: Jean-Michel HUFFLEN <jmhuffle@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• [Scheme-reports] John Cowan's votes on the sixth ballot
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes on the sixth ballot
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes on the sixth ballot
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes on the sixth ballot
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Automatic delay-force
  • From: Devon Schudy <dschudy@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes on the sixth ballot
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] decoding strings from bytevectors
  • From: Marijn <hkBst@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes on the sixth ballot
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes on the sixth ballot
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] (read|write)-char [was Opinion about R7RS]
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• [scheme-reports-wg1] Fwd: [Scheme-reports] decoding strings from bytevectors
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Fwd: [Scheme-reports] decoding strings from bytevectors
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] decoding strings from bytevectors
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] (read|write)-char [was Opinion about R7RS]
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] (read|write)-char [was Opinion about R7RS]
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] quasisyntax extension
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Automatic delay-force
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Automatic delay-force
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Preliminary vote
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: will@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] WG1BallotRead published, John Cowan's comments
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] WG1BallotRead published, John Cowan's comments
  • From: Bradley Lucier <lucier@x>
• [Scheme-reports] (angle -0.0-0.0i) should be -pi, but R7RS-draft-6 prohibits this
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] (angle -0.0-0.0i) should be -pi, but R7RS-draft-6 prohibits this
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] (angle -0.0-0.0i) should be -pi, but R7RS-draft-6 prohibits this
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] (angle -0.0-0.0i) should be -pi, but R7RS-draft-6 prohibits this
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Definition of expt (was #391 - a selection of error predicates)
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Definition of expt (was #391 - a selection of error predicates)
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Definition of expt (was #391 - a selection of error predicates)
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@x - 13 Messages in 5 Topics
  • From: Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@x - 13 Messages in 5 Topics
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@x - 13 Messages in 5 Topics
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@x - 13 Messages in 5 Topics
  • From: Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@x - 13 Messages in 5 Topics
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@x - 13 Messages in 5 Topics
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@x - 13 Messages in 5 Topics
  • From: Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Digest for scheme-reports-wg1@x - 13 Messages in 5 Topics
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] #460 eqv? deliberations
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful.
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful.
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful.
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful.
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful.
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? considered harmful.
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] #460 eqv? deliberations
  • From: "Bill Schottstaedt" <bil@x>
• [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Comments on draft 6 about call/cc
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: Daniel Krueger <keenbug@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] valid implementation of call-with-input-file?
  • From: <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] new wording for eqv?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] new wording for eqv?
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] #370 log of zero
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] #370 log of zero
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: Pierpaolo Bernardi <olopierpa@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] No (bytevector n ...) ?
  • From: Christian Stigen Larsen <csl@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] No (bytevector n ...) ?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] No (bytevector n ...) ?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] No (bytevector n ...) ?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] No (bytevector n ...) ?
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Cycle detection problems: #442, #338, "equal?"
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand
  • From: Christian Stigen Larsen <csl@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Questions about cond-expand
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand)
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] [Scheme-reports] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand)
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand)
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand)
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] [Scheme-reports] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand)
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand)
  • From: Aaron W. Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fixing libraries (was Re: Questions about cond-expand)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Daniel Weinreb
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Daniel Weinreb
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• [Scheme-reports] <transformer spec> BNF
  • From: "Taylan Ulrich B." <taylanbayirli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] <transformer spec> BNF
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] <transformer spec> BNF
  • From: "Taylan Ulrich B." <taylanbayirli@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Updates to draft 6
  • From: Steve Hafner <steve.b.hafner@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Updates to draft 6
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] (angle -0.0-0.0i) should be -pi, but R7RS-draft-6 prohibits this
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Definition of expt when the base is exact 0 (was Re: John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot)
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Definition of expt when the base is exact 0 (was Re: John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot)
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Definition of expt when the base is exact 0 (was Re: John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot)
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Definition of expt when the base is exact 0 (was Re: John Cowan's votes and rationales on the seventh ballot)
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Updated list of latest Scheme releases
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #360: Change syntax of escaped symbols from |...| to #"..."
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #372: Formal Comment: (exit #t) should be the same as (exit)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #421: #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case have no final delimiter
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #423: The list of cases where `eqv?` returns `#t` does not mention procedures
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #424: Add write-string procedure to (scheme base)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #430: clarify library loading rules
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #434: List of named characters is incomplete
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #435: Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #436: Generalization of append, map, and for-each to other sequences
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #438: Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #439: Bidirectional ports and port-open?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #440: Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #360: Change syntax of escaped symbols from |...| to #"..."
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #435: Bytevectors should be called u8vectors
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #440: Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #453: The denotational semantics
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: Sam TH <sam@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS
  • From: Michael Sperber <sperber@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] set! and imported identifiers
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] set! and imported identifiers
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] set! and imported identifiers
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] set! and imported identifiers
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS
  • From: Michael Sperber <sperber@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #456: Adoption of R6RS
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot
  • From: Takashi Kato <ktakashi@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] poll: invalid item #315 from 5th ballot
  • From: Takashi Kato <ktakashi@x>
• [Scheme-reports] editorial: 2-argument log function
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] editorial: 2-argument log function
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] editorial: 2-argument log function
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] editorial: 2-argument log function
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7
  • From: Takashi Kato <ktakashi@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7
  • From: Takashi Kato <ktakashi@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Comment on R7RS draft 7
  • From: Anders Östlund <anders.n.ostlund@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comment on R7RS draft 7
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] editorial: missing index entry and cross-reference for import
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] the features function
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Missing #
  • From: Takashi Kato <ktakashi@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] the features function
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Missing #
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] editorial: missing index entry and cross-reference for import
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 7
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] meaning of r7rs standard feature identifier
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted
  • From: Takashi Kato <ktakashi@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted
  • From: Takashi Kato <ktakashi@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Comment on draft 7 regarding <non-digit>
  • From: David Adler <d.adler.s@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
  • From: Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comment on draft 7 regarding <non-digit>
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] **-copy! doesn't specify when start and end is omitted
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] is there a difference between substring and string-copy?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages.
  • From: Arthur Smyles <atsmyles@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages.
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages.
  • From: Arthur Smyles <atsmyles@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages.
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages.
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Test suite
  • From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Test suite
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Beta reduction
  • From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Beta reduction
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Marc Feeley <feeley@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] equal?
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] equal?
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] equal?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] equal?
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Name supported?
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Signaled errors need not raise error objects
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading
  • From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading
  • From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading
  • From: Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading
  • From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Signaled errors need not raise error objects
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading
  • From: Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "It is an error" is misleading
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages.
  • From: Arthur Smyles <atsmyles@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] read-error? and file-error? should be part of their respective packages.
  • From: Arthur Smyles <atsmyles@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Name supported?
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] equal?
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed language for 'eqv?' applied to inexact real numbers
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Marijn <hkBst@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Literal string not quoted speech
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Suggestion to put display and newline in the same library
  • From: Christian Stigen Larsen <csl@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Suggestion to put display and newline in the same library
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] let*-values' definition
  • From: Jean-Michel HUFFLEN <jmhuffle@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] let*-values' definition
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: R7RS 'eqv?' cannot be used for reliable memoization
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #423: When does eqv? return #t for procedures?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #424: Add write-string procedure to (scheme base)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #430: clarify library loading rules
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #434: List of named characters is incomplete
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #438 (also known as #437): Inconsistency of sequence copying procedures
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #439: Bidirectional ports and port-open?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #440: Write procedure is not backwards compatible
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #455 (also known as #454): What is a dynamic environment?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Response to #456: Adoption of R6RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Summary of Formal Comments and Objections
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Summary of Formal Comments and Objections
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Summary of Formal Comments and Objections
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal Comments to R7RS-small draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Inexact numbers and `eqv?`: the post I didn't want to make
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Inexact numbers and `eqv?`: the post I didn't want to make
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Inexact numbers and `eqv?`: the post I didn't want to make
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] More editorial comments
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] More editorial comments
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS
  • From: Sascha Ziemann <ceving@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] scheme-report-environment/null-environment only for R5RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Problems with the 9th ballot
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Inexact numbers and `eqv?`: the post I didn't want to make
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Problems with the 9th ballot
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] John Cowan votes for `r6rs` (operational equivalence)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] More editorial comments
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] John Cowan votes for `r6rs` (operational equivalence)
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS 7th draft available
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] formal comment: Using "scheme" for standard library is problematic
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Stefan Edwards <saedwards.ecc@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Formal definitions [con'd]
  • From: Jean-Michel HUFFLEN <jmhuffle@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal definitions [con'd]
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Comments on R7RS, draft 7
  • From: Steve Hafner <steve.b.hafner@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on R7RS, draft 7
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal definitions [con'd]
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on R7RS, draft 7
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal definitions [con'd]
  • From: Jean-Michel HUFFLEN <jmhuffle@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal definitions [con'd]
  • From: Jean-Michel HUFFLEN <jmhuffle@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Updated list of latest Scheme releases
  • From: Jim Wise <jwise@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Updated list of latest Scheme releases
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS draft 8 available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS draft 8 available
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS draft 8 available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS draft 8 available
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS draft 8 available
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Updated list of latest Scheme releases
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Updated list of latest Scheme releases
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] confusing example in 6.11. Exceptions
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] possible error in specification of guard
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Updated list of latest Scheme releases
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] confusing example in 6.11. Exceptions
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] possible error in specification of guard
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] confusing example in 6.11. Exceptions
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] confusing example in 6.11. Exceptions
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Updated list of latest Scheme releases
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Updated list of latest Scheme releases
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Updated list of latest Scheme releases
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Sascha Ziemann <ceving@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Sascha Ziemann <ceving@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Updated list of latest Scheme releases
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Tracking change in the Scheme reports
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Tracking change in the Scheme reports
  • From: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm.tredinnick@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Tracking change in the Scheme reports
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Implied equality
  • From: Biep <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Implied equality
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] possible error in specification of guard
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] possible error in specification of guard
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] possible error in specification of guard
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-n.pdf raw source text?
  • From: Joseph Wayne Norton <norton@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] r7rs-draft-n.pdf raw source text?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Overview of R7RS-small
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Overview of R7RS-small
  • From: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm.tredinnick@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Overview of R7RS-small
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Scheme r7rs syntax described by ABNF
  • From: Joseph Wayne Norton <norton@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Location of definitions inside libraries
  • From: Christian Stigen Larsen <csl@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Location of definitions inside libraries
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Location of definitions inside libraries
  • From: Christian Stigen Larsen <csl@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Location of definitions inside libraries
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Location of definitions inside libraries
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Location of definitions inside libraries
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Location of definitions inside libraries
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Location of definitions inside libraries
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large library declarations
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large library declarations
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large library declarations
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large library declarations
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large library declarations
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Return value for unmatched cond-expand
  • From: Christian Stigen Larsen <csl@x>
• [scheme-reports-wg1] Re: [Scheme-reports] Return value for unmatched cond-expand
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Missing parenthesis in bytevector-u8-set! example code
  • From: Justin Ethier <justin.ethier@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Missing parenthesis in bytevector-u8-set! example code
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?
  • From: Daniel Villeneuve <dvilleneuve@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• [Scheme-reports] discrepancies in formal library syntax: begin and include-library-declarations
  • From: Daniel Villeneuve <dvilleneuve@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] discrepancies in formal library syntax: begin and include-library-declarations
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] equivalent rewrite of a sequence of (syntax) definitions?
  • From: Daniel Villeneuve <dvilleneuve@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] equivalent rewrite of a sequence of (syntax) definitions?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] equivalent rewrite of a sequence of (syntax) definitions?
  • From: Daniel Villeneuve <dvilleneuve@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] REPL
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] notes and thoughts on r7rs draft 8
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] file-error?, read-error?, and specificity of error objects
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] "the result is unspecified" vs "unspecified values"
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 1.3.3 Entry conventions
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 1.3.5 Naming conventions
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 2.1 Identifiers
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 4.1.2 Literal expressions
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 4.1.7 Inclusion
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] libraries, cond-expand, begin, and expressions vs definitions
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 1.3.5 Naming conventions
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• [Scheme-reports] "letrec" entry heading
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 4.2.3 sequencing
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] "force", "parameterize" implementation notes
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] `guard' is crazy
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] ` , and ,@
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 4.3 Macros
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 5. Program Structure
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 5.6 Libraries
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Equivalence predicates; 6.2 Numbers
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] string->utf8
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 6.10 Control Structures
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 6.13 I/O
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 6.14 System interface
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] "Language Changes"
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.6 Libraries
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5. Program Structure
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.1.2 Literal expressions
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.1.7 Inclusion
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "letrec" entry heading
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "force", "parameterize" implementation notes
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] `guard' is crazy
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.1 Equivalence predicates; 6.2 Numbers
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] string->utf8
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.10 Control Structures
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] libraries, cond-expand, begin, and expressions vs definitions
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "the result is unspecified" vs "unspecified values"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] file-error?, read-error?, and specificity of error objects
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 1.3.3 Entry conventions
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 1.3.5 Naming conventions
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] libraries, cond-expand, begin, and expressions vs definitions
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5. Program Structure
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.13 I/O
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.14 System interface
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "Language Changes"
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5. Program Structure
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.10 Control Structures
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "force", "parameterize" implementation notes
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] libraries, cond-expand, begin, and expressions vs definitions
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "the result is unspecified" vs "unspecified values"
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.10 Control Structures
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] "Language Changes"
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] multiple values, and, or, when, unless
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Implied equality
  • From: Biep <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.3 Macros
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5. Program Structure
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] libraries, cond-expand, begin, and expressions vs definitions
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Removing the requirement for a "changes since R6RS" section
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Implied equality
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Onderwerp: Re: Implied equality
  • From: Biep <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Return value for unmatched cond-expand
  • From: Christian Stigen Larsen <csl@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5. Program Structure
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5. Program Structure
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Removing the requirement for a "changes since R6RS" section
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Removing the requirement for a "changes since R6RS" section
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Removing the requirement for a "changes since R6RS" section
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Removing the requirement for a "changes since R6RS" section
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme r7rs syntax described by ABNF
  • From: ノートン ジョーセフ ウェイ ン <norton@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Issues with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.1 <symbol element>
  • From: "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Re: Issues with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.1 <symbol element>
  • From: "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.1 <symbol element>
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.1 <symbol element>
  • From: Joseph Wayne Norton <norton@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.1 <symbol element>
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] suggestion for R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.7 <library name part>
  • From: Joseph Wayne Norton <norton@x>
• [Scheme-reports] issue with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.7 <comment>
  • From: Joseph Wayne Norton <norton@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] suggestion for R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.7 <library name part>
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] issue with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.7 <comment>
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] issue with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.7 <comment>
  • From: Joseph Wayne Norton <norton@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Typos with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.6 <def formals> and <definition> ?
  • From: ノートン ジョーセフ ウェイ ン <norton@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Typos with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.6 <def formals> and <definition> ?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Typos with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.6 <def formals> and <definition> ?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Typos with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.6 <def formals> and <definition> ?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Typos with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.6 <def formals> and <definition> ?
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 2.1 Identifiers
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme r7rs syntax described by ABNF
  • From: ノートン ジョーセフ ウェイ ン <norton@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme r7rs syntax described by ABNF
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme r7rs syntax described by ABNF
  • From: Joseph Wayne Norton <norton@x>
• [Scheme-reports] question with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.6 <definition> and 7.1.7 <library declaration>
  • From: ノートン ジョーセフ ウェイ ン <norton@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ` , and ,@
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme r7rs syntax described by ABNF
  • From: ノートン ジョーセフ ウェイ ン <norton@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Scheme r7rs syntax described by ABNF
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Useless ambiguities in number specification, section 7.1.1
  • From: "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Useless ambiguities in number specification, section 7.1.1
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Useless ambiguities in number specification, section 7.1.1
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Useless ambiguities in number specification, section 7.1.1
  • From: "David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Useless ambiguities in number specification, section 7.1.1
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Question regarding R7RS draft 8 regarding section 1.3.3 Entry format
  • From: ノートン ジョーセフ ウェイ ン <norton@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Question regarding R7RS draft 8 regarding section 1.3.3 Entry format
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Question regarding R7RS draft 8 regarding section 1.3.3 Entry format
  • From: ノートン ジョーセフ ウェイ ン <norton@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Question regarding R7RS draft 8 regarding section 1.3.3 Entry format
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Question regarding R7RS draft 8 regarding section 1.3.3 Entry format
  • From: ノートン ジョーセフ ウェイ ン <norton@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Question regarding R7RS draft 8 regarding section 1.3.3 Entry format
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Immutable environments?
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Immutable environments?
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Immutable environments?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Immutable environments?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Immutable environments?
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Language changes section of the latest draft
  • From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <j_p@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5. Program Structure
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 5. Program Structure
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Language changes section of the latest draft
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 9th draft of R7RS-small released
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Promises that force themselves
  • From: Alan Manuel Gloria <almkglor@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Promises that force themselves
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Promises that force themselves
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Promises that force themselves
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Promises that force themselves
  • From: Alan Manuel Gloria <almkglor@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Promises that force themselves
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large library proposal: Pure Delayed Evaluation
  • From: Alan Manuel Gloria <almkglor@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Promises that force themselves
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large library proposal: Pure Delayed Evaluation
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] How about relaxing a dot notation restriction?
  • From: Sascha Ziemann <ceving@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] How about relaxing a dot notation restriction?
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS - questions concerning variable definitions and binding constructs
  • From: ノートン ジョーセフ ウェイ ン <norton@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS - questions concerning variable definitions and binding constructs
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] How about relaxing a dot notation restriction?
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich B.)
• [Scheme-reports] IO operations and random access
  • From: Paul Pereira <pjspereira@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] IO operations and random access
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS - questions concerning variable definitions and binding constructs
  • From: ノートン ジョーセフ ウェイ ン <norton@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS - questions concerning variable definitions and binding constructs
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] About the behavior of continuation in top-level begin form
  • From: 張書瀚 <zrqsmcx@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] About the behavior of continuation in top-level begin form
  • From: 張書瀚 <zrqsmcx@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] About the behavior of continuation in top-level begin form
  • From: 張書瀚 <zrqsmcx@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] About the behavior of continuation in top-level begin form
  • From: 張書瀚 <zrqsmcx@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] About the behavior of continuation in top-level begin form
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] About the behavior of continuation in top-level begin form
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] About the behavior of continuation in top-level begin form
  • From: 張書瀚 <zrqsmcx@x>
• [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: William D Clinger <will@x>
• [Scheme-reports] thanks to everyone who's contributed so far
  • From: William D Clinger <will@x>
• [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Jay Freeman <jay_reynolds_freeman@x>
• [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: "Jeronimo Pellegrini" <j_p@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS WG1 ratification vote: Andy Wingo
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Sam TH <sam@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Ivan Raikov <ivan.g.raikov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Michael Sperber <sperber@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Jim Wise <jwise@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS-small draft 9 page 25 typo?
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich B.)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-small draft 9 page 25 typo?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] New PlebisciteIndex page
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: J Altfas <pdx@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Plebiscite Vote: Aaron W. Hsu (yes)
  • From: Aaron W.Hsu <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Plebiscite Vote: Aaron W. Hsu (yes)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Plebiscite Vote: Aaron W. Hsu (yes)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Plebiscite Vote: Aaron W. Hsu (yes)
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Plebiscite Vote: Aaron W. Hsu (yes)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Andrew Robbins <andjrob@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Sam TH <sam@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Jim Wise <jwise@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Sam TH <sam@x>
• [Scheme-reports] [felix@x: Fw: ratification vote for R7RS-small]
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS syntax object questions
  • From: Stephen Lewis <lewis+scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS syntax object questions
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS syntax object questions
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS draft #9 - copy-n-paste error for section 6.7 Strings
  • From: Joseph Wayne Norton <norton@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS draft #9 - copy-n-paste error for section 6.7 Strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS draft #9 - copy-n-paste error for section 6.7 Strings
  • From: Andrew Robbins <andjrob@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS draft #9 - copy-n-paste error for section 6.7 Strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS draft #9 - copy-n-paste error for section 6.7 Strings
  • From: Andrew Robbins <andjrob@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Proposed revision of WG2's charter
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: John David Stone <stone@x>
• [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS
  • From: David Krentzlin <david@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: R7RS
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: R7RS
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: R7RS
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: R7RS
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: R7RS
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: R7RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: R7RS
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: R7RS
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Mailing to the list
  • From: Biep <scheme@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Proposed revision of WG2's charter
  • From: Aaron W.Hsu <arcfide@x>
• [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for r7rs-small
  • From: "Bill Schottstaedt" <bil@x>
• [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Takashi Kato <ktakashi@x>
• [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: OKUMURA Yuki <mjt@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Proposed revision of WG2's charter
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Sam TH <sam@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Proposed revision of WG2's charter
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] [lucier@x: Fwd: vote]
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Proposed revision of WG2's charter
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: R7RS
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: R7RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for r7rs-small
  • From: gjs@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for r7rs-small
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: R7RS
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: R7RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: R7RS
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Reverting to R5RS semantics of procedure identity
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS
  • From: Jonathan Rees <jar@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Jonathan Rees <jar@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Daniel Villeneuve <dvilleneuve@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Jonathan Rees <jar@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Jonathan Rees <jar@x>
• [Scheme-reports] disregard duplicate
  • From: Jonathan Rees <jar@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Tom Kwong <tk3369@x>
• [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: David Banks <amoebae@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Arthur Smyles <atsmyles@x>
• [Scheme-reports] [moritz@x: R7RS-small ratification vote]
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Arthur Smyles <atsmyles@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Steven Ganz <steven.ganz@x>
• [Scheme-reports] [alexander.shendi@x: R7RS ballot]
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for r7rs-small
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reverting to R5RS semantics of procedure identity
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reverting to R5RS semantics of procedure identity
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS Small
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Göran Weinholt <goran@x>
• [Scheme-reports] extension of voting period
  • From: will@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] extension of voting period
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] extension of voting period
  • From: will@x
• [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #2: additional character names
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Post-plebiscite issue #2: additional character names
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Post-plebiscite issue #2: additional character names
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping
  • From: will@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping
  • From: will@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS Small
  • From: Mikael <mikael.crspdc@x>
• [Scheme-reports] library at file level (was: Ratification vote for R7RS Small)
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Why define-library requires a explicit begin form?
  • From: 張書瀚 <zrqsmcx@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote on R7RS-small
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Christian Stigen Larsen <csl@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Sven Hartrumpf <hartrumpf@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Why define-library requires a explicit begin form?
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich B.)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level (was: Ratification vote for R7RS Small)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] New PlebisciteObjections page
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level (was: Ratification vote for R7RS Small)
  • From: Sam TH <sam@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: "Marco Benelli" <mbenelli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level (was: Ratification vote for R7RS Small)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level (was: Ratification vote for R7RS Small)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Indentation (was: Ratification vote for R7RS Small)
  • From: Alexey Radul <axch@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Why define-library requires a explicit begin form?
  • From: 張書瀚 <zrqsmcx@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level (was: Ratification vote for R7RS Small)
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS WG1 ratification vote: Christian Kellermann
  • From: Christian Kellermann <ckeen@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: "Sudarshan S. Chawathe" <chaw@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] New PlebisciteObjections page
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• [Scheme-reports] [mail@x: R7RS-small ratification vote]
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] New PlebisciteObjections page
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level (was: Ratification vote for R7RS Small)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] New PlebisciteObjections page
  • From: Jay Sulzberger <jays@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Indentation (was: Ratification vote for R7RS Small)
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level (was: Ratification vote for R7RS Small)
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich B.)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] library at file level
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Jean-Michel HUFFLEN <jmhuffle@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: "a.e.handy" <aeh@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Andrew Robbins <andjrob@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 9th draft of R7RS-small (ratification vote)
  • From: "Juergen Lorenz" <ju@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 9th draft of R7RS-small (ratification vote)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] [mikemon@x: R7RS-small ratification vote]
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [mikemon@x: R7RS-small ratification vote]
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] r7rs small ratification vote
  • From: Felix Klock <pnkfelix@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Mario Domenech Goulart <mario.goulart@x>
• [Scheme-reports] [tara@x: Vote for R7RS-Small]
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Vote for R7RS-Small
  • From: Stephen Lewis <lewis+scheme@x>
• [Scheme-reports] libraries
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] libraries
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS ratification vote
  • From: Kevin Wortman <kwortman@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Two Informal Comments on r7rs Small, draft 9
  • From: Jay Sulzberger <jays@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS ratification vote
  • From: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS ratification vote
  • From: David Kendal <me@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 9th draft of R/RS-small (ratification vote)
  • From: "Juergen Lorenz" <ju@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Two Informal Comments on r7rs Small, draft 9
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: will@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] libraries
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] libraries
  • From: Alexey Radul <axch@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] libraries
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Justin Ethier <justin.ethier@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  • From: Arthur Maciel <arthurmaciel@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS ratification vote
  • From: Seth Alves <alves@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 9th draft of R7RS-small (ratification vote)
  • From: Jay Sulzberger <jays@x>
• Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] NinthDraftEditorialChanges
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Post-plebiscite issues
  • From: Vincent Manis <vmanis@x>
• [Scheme-reports] ADMIN: open posting on the WG2 mailing list begins
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] [pierarda@x: Fwd: Ratification R7RS]
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] voting has ended
  • From: will@x
• [Scheme-reports] Unhygienic macros?
  • From: Sanel Zukan <sanelz@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Unhygienic macros?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] voting has ended
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Daniel Hartwig <mandyke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Daniel Hartwig <mandyke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Evan Hanson <evhan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Evan Hanson <evhan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Question regarding interaction between new syntax-rules extensions
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich B.)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Question regarding interaction between new syntax-rules extensions
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich B.)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Question regarding interaction between new syntax-rules extensions
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Question regarding interaction between new syntax-rules extensions
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Unhygienic macros?
  • From: Sanel Zukan <sanelz@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Question regarding interaction between new syntax-rules extensions
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Question regarding interaction between new syntax-rules extensions
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Unhygienic macros?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Kevin Wortman <kwortman@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Alexey Radul <axch@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Alexey Radul <axch@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Alexey Radul <axch@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich B.)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Description of self-evaluation is a bit too terse
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Description of self-evaluation is a bit too terse
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Updated sets pre-SRFI and implementation
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Alexey Radul <axch@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Evan Hanson <evhan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Alexey Radul <axch@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Alexey Radul <axch@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Question regarding interaction between new syntax-rules extensions
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Biep <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Alexey Radul <axch@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: Biep <scheme@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Steering Committee requests one more draft of the R7RS small language document
  • From: will@x
• [Scheme-reports] Call for editorial assistance
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Call for editorial assistance
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich B.)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Call for editorial assistance
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: will@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: will@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Scheme-reports Digest, Vol 41, Issue 4
  • From: Gerald Jay Sussman <gjs@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity
  • From: Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich B.)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich B.)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich B.)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich B.)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedure equivalence: the last debate
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: William D Clinger <will@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: William D Clinger <will@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: will@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Procedure equivalence: the last debate
  • From: will@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: will@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich B.)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich B.)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: will@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: will@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: will@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: will@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: will@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9)
  • From: Daniel Villeneuve <dvilleneuve@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9)
  • From: Takashi Kato <ktakashi@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Re: file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9)
  • From: Daniel Villeneuve <dvilleneuve@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9)
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9)
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures
  • From: Alexey Radul <axch@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] procedure identity
  • From: Kevin Millikin <kmillikin@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] file inclusion (section 4.1.7 of draft 9)
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich B.)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich B.)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: Alexey Radul <axch@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich B.)
• [Scheme-reports] Top-level cond-expand for backwards compatibility
  • From: Christian Stigen Larsen <csl@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Top-level cond-expand for backwards compatibility
  • From: William D Clinger <will@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Top-level cond-expand for backwards compatibility
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: Seeking review of sets and hash tables proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Call for vote: SRFI 111, Boxes
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Call for vote: SRFI 111, Boxes
  • From: Daniel Villeneuve <dvilleneuve@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Call for vote: SRFI 111, Boxes
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: Call for vote: SRFI 111, Boxes
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich B.)
• [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: Kevin Wortman <kwortman@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: Kevin Wortman <kwortman@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators
  • From: Andrew Robbins <andjrob@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through
  • From: Chris Hanson <cph@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through
  • From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through
  • From: Chris Hanson <cph@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through
  • From: Chris Hanson <cph@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] SRFI 111, Boxes, added to R7RS-large
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Call for vote: SRFI 112, Environment inquiry
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators
  • From: Kevin Wortman <kwortman@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators
  • From: Noah Lavine <noah.b.lavine@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators
  • From: Alexey Radul <axch@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators
  • From: Marijn <hkBst@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators
  • From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators
  • From: Roderic Morris <roderyc@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators
  • From: Alexey Radul <axch@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators
  • From: Marijn <hkBst@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators
  • From: Kevin Wortman <kwortman@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: Grant Rettke <grettke@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators
  • From: Alexey Radul <axch@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators
  • From: Kevin Wortman <kwortman@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Issues from read-through
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] ADMIN: Aborting vote on SRFI-112 as part of R7RS-large
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Is R6RS in the public domain?
  • From: Musical Notation <musicdenotation@x>
• [Scheme-reports] When will R7RS be released?
  • From: Musical Notation <musicdenotation@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] When will R7RS be released?
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] When will R7RS be released?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Licensing of R7RS
  • From: Musical Notation <musicdenotation@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Licensing of R7RS
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Licensing of R7RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
  • From: Musical Notation <musicdenotation@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
  • From: Musical Notation <musicdenotation@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
  • From: Joe Marshall <jmarshall@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
  • From: John David Stone <stone@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
  • From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
  • From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
  • From: Joe Marshall <jmarshall@x>
• Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
  • From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@x>
• [Scheme-reports] You all don't need to do anything to change the licensing
  • From: Musical Notation <musicdenotation@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Is R6RS in the public domain?
  • From: Hikari Boulders <hikari.boulders@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
  • From: Kevin Wortman <kwortman@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
  • From: Hikari Boulders <hikari.boulders@x>
• [Scheme-reports] We can stop talking about licensing now
  • From: Musical Notation <musicdenotation@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Unclear word in license grant
  • From: John David Stone <stone@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Stop, please!
  • From: Musical Notation <musicdenotation@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS final (draft #10?) - question for section 4.3.2 Pattern language and 7.1.5 Transformers
  • From: Joseph Wayne Norton <norton@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS final (draft #10?) - question for section 4.3.2 Pattern language and 7.1.5 Transformers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS final (draft #10?) - question for section 4.3.2 Pattern language and 7.1.5 Transformers
  • From: Joseph Wayne Norton <norton@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS final (draft #10?) - question for section 4.3.2 Pattern language and 7.1.5 Transformers
  • From: Joseph Wayne Norton <norton@x>
• [Scheme-reports] boolean=?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] boolean=?
  • From: Erik Falor <ewfalor@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] boolean=?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] I just signed “Speaker of the Lok Sabha Shrimati Meira Kumar: Send the RTI (Amendment) Bill, 2013 to a Standing Committee/Select Committee ”
  • From: Nataraj S Narayan <mail@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite?
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite?
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS test suite?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS final draft - bug report for section 7.3 Derived expression types
  • From: Joseph Wayne Norton <norton@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS final draft - bug report for section 7.3 Derived expression types
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] result of (infinite? +nan.0+inf.0i)
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] result of (infinite? +nan.0+inf.0i)
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] result of (infinite? +nan.0+inf.0i)
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Typo in Description for (string-copy!) in R7RS Draft 9
  • From: Ryan Cumming <etaoins@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Closing SRFI-112 and voting on it for R7RS-large
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Closing SRFI-112 and voting on it for R7RS-large
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Closing SRFI-112 and voting on it for R7RS-large
  • From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Typo in Description for (string-copy!) in R7RS Draft 9
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Closing SRFI-112 and voting on it for R7RS-large
  • From: David Kendal <me@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Closing SRFI-112 and voting on it for R7RS-large
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Closing SRFI-112 and voting on it for R7RS-large
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Closing SRFI-112 and voting on it for R7RS-large
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Closing SRFI-112 and voting on it for R7RS-large
  • From: Christian Stigen Larsen <csl@x>
• [Scheme-reports] command-line and invocation manner
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line and invocation manner
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line and invocation manner
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] command-line and invocation manner
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] #
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] #
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape
  • From: Jay Sulzberger <jays@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] #
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] inconsistent use of \| escape
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• [Scheme-reports] #\@ starting an identifiers
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] #\@ starting an identifiers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] #\@ starting an identifiers
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] #\@ starting an identifiers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] ANN: SRFI 155: Scheme Regular Expressions
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] programs and cond-expand
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• [Scheme-reports] loading libraries
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] programs and cond-expand
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] loading libraries
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] loading libraries
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] programs and cond-expand
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] loading libraries
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] programs and cond-expand
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] programs and cond-expand
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] loading libraries
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] loading libraries
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] programs and cond-expand
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] programs and cond-expand
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] programs and cond-expand
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] programs and cond-expand
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] programs and cond-expand
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] programs and cond-expand
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] programs and cond-expand
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Is bytevector a token?
  • From: Yuichi Nishiwaki <yuichi.nishiwaki@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Is bytevector a token?
  • From: Takashi Kato <ktakashi@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Is bytevector a token?
  • From: Yuichi Nishiwaki <yuichi.nishiwaki@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Is bytevector a token?
  • From: Takashi Kato <ktakashi@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Is bytevector a token?
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Bibliography: SRFI-4 URI is wrong
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Features
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Features
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Features
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Features
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Features
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Features
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] The TeX source code of Scheme reports
  • From: Kalinni Gorzkis <musicdenotation@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] The TeX source code of Scheme reports
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS-small draft ratified by Steering Committee
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] grammar of numbers
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] grammar of numbers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] grammar of numbers
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] grammar of numbers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] grammar of numbers
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] grammar of numbers
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Common Lisp-like read macros in Scheme
  • From: musicdenotation@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Common Lisp-like read macros in Scheme
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Proposal to add fexprs
  • From: Kalinni Gorzkis <musicdenotation@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Common Lisp-like read macros in Scheme
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal to add fexprs
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal to add fexprs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal to add fexprs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal to add fexprs
  • From: Brian Nguyen <musicdenotation@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal to add fexprs
  • From: musicdenotation@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal to add fexprs
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal to add fexprs
  • From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal to add fexprs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal to add fexprs
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal to add fexprs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal to add fexprs
  • From: Vassil Nikolov <vnikolov@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal to add fexprs
  • From: Bear <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal to add fexprs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal to add fexprs
  • From: Sascha Ziemann <ceving@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal to add fexprs
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal to add fexprs
  • From: Sascha Ziemann <ceving@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposal to add fexprs
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Question about R6RS standard-{input, output, error}-port
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Question about R6RS standard-{input, output, error}-port
  • From: leppie <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Question about R6RS standard-{input, output, error}-port
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Question about R6RS standard-{input, output, error}-port
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Question about R6RS standard-{input, output, error}-port
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Erratum for letrec* definition
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Erratum for letrec* definition
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Erratum for letrec* definition
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Erratum for letrec* definition
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum?
  • From: Yuichi Nishiwaki <yuichi.nishiwaki@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Erratum for letrec* definition
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum?
  • From: Yuichi Nishiwaki <yuichi.nishiwaki@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Erratum for letrec* definition
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg1] Erratum for letrec* definition
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum?
  • From: Yuichi Nishiwaki <yuichi.nishiwaki@x>
• [Scheme-reports] New versions of SRFI 113 and 114
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] An erratum in section 5.3.3?
  • From: Yuichi Nishiwaki <yuichi.nishiwaki@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] An erratum in section 5.3.3?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] An erratum in section 5.3.3?
  • From: Yuichi Nishiwaki <yuichi.nishiwaki@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Exceptions on JVM [was: Exceptions needs examples]
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• [Scheme-reports] <body> of let-syntax
  • From: Takashi Kato <ktakashi@x>
• [Scheme-reports] <body> of let-syntax
  • From: Takashi Kato <ktakashi@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] <body> of let-syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] <body> of let-syntax
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] <body> of let-syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] <body> of let-syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Import declarations in programs
  • From: Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <marc.nieper@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Import declarations in programs
  • From: Jim Rees <jimreesma@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Import declarations in programs
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Import declarations in programs
  • From: arcfide@x (Aaron W. Hsu)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Import declarations in programs
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Import declarations in programs
  • From: Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <marc.nieper@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Import declarations in programs
  • From: arcfide@x (Aaron W. Hsu)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Import declarations in programs
  • From: arcfide@x (Aaron W. Hsu)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Import declarations in programs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Replacing two identifiers with the same in an import declaration
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Replacing two identifiers with the same in an import declaration
  • From: Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <marc.nieper@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Libraries that are referenced more than once
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Libraries that are referenced more than once
  • From: Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <marc.nieper@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Libraries that are referenced more than once
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Libraries that are referenced more than once
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Libraries that are referenced more than once
  • From: Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <marc.nieper@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Identifiers imported "by reference or value"?
  • From: Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <marc.nieper@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Identifiers imported "by reference or value"?
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Identifiers imported "by reference or value"?
  • From: Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <marc.nieper@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Identifiers imported "by reference or value"?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Identifiers imported "by reference or value"?
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Identifiers imported "by reference or value"?
  • From: Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <marc.nieper@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Identifiers imported "by reference or value"?
  • From: Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <marc.nieper@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Identifiers imported "by reference or value"?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Identifiers imported "by reference or value"?
  • From: Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen <marc.nieper@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Identifiers imported "by reference or value"?
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] eq? and eqv? for records
  • From: Sascha Ziemann <ceving@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Hard to find the final R7RS-small PDF
  • From: Christian Stigen Larsen <csl@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? and eqv? for records
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Hard to find the final R7RS-small PDF
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? and eqv? for records
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? and eqv? for records
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? and eqv? for records
  • From: Sascha Ziemann <ceving@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? and eqv? for records
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? and eqv? for records
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? and eqv? for records
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? and eqv? for records
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? and eqv? for records
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? and eqv? for records
  • From: taylanbayirli@x (Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] eq? and eqv? for records
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] TAI epoch
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] TAI epoch
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] TAI epoch
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] TAI epoch
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Pattern matching and list comprehensions
  • From: Denis Trapeznikoff <denin@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Pattern matching and list comprehensions
  • From: Panicz Maciej Godek <godek.maciek@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Pattern matching and list comprehensions
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Pattern matching and list comprehensions
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Pattern matching and list comprehensions
  • From: Denis Trapeznikoff <denin@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Pattern matching and list comprehensions
  • From: Alan Manuel Gloria <almkglor@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Pattern matching and list comprehensions
  • From: Panicz Maciej Godek <godek.maciek@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] TAI epoch
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] TAI epoch
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] TAI epoch
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Pattern matching and list comprehensions
  • From: Denis Trapeznikoff <denin@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] TAI epoch
  • From: Bear <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] TAI epoch
  • From: Alan Watson <alan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] TAI epoch
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Installing the floor of the R7RS-large numeric tower
  • From: Kevin Wortman <kwortman@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] numeric tower
  • From: "Bill Schottstaedt" <bil@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Installing the floor of the R7RS-large numeric tower
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Looking for collaborators to develop a formally verified implementation for R7RS (small) using Coq.
  • From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] numeric tower
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Installing the floor of the R7RS-large numeric tower
  • From: Christian Stigen Larsen <cslarsen@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] My vote
  • From: Gerald Jay Sussman <gjs@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] DISCUSSION/VOTE: The character tower
  • From: Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer <taylanbayirli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] DISCUSSION/VOTE: The character tower
  • From: Bear <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] DISCUSSION/VOTE: The character tower
  • From: Bear <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: Christian Stigen Larsen <cslarsen@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] DISCUSSION/VOTE: The character tower
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] DISCUSSION/VOTE: The character tower
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] DISCUSSION/VOTE: The character tower
  • From: Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] DISCUSSION/VOTE: The character tower
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] DISCUSSION/VOTE: The character tower
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] DISCUSSION/VOTE: The character tower
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] DISCUSSION/VOTE: The character tower
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] DISCUSSION/VOTE: The character tower
  • From: Christian Stigen Larsen <cslarsen@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Proposed R7RS-large library declarations
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: Sascha Ziemann <ceving@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: <xacc.ide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] dealing with non-BMP characters [was: Reformulated numeric-tower ballot]
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] dealing with non-BMP characters [was: Reformulated numeric-tower ballot]
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: Bear <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: Bakul Shah <bakul@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Orthogonality in the numeric tower
  • From: Biep <scheme@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Orthogonality in the numeric tower
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] The error of the number of make-promise's arguments
  • From: Wataru Nakanishi <stibear1996@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] The error of the number of make-promise's arguments
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] R7RS license
  • From: musicdenotation@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS license
  • From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS license
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS license
  • From: musicdenotation@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS license
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS license
  • From: Kevin Wortman <kwortman@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS license
  • From: Jonathan Rees <jar@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS license
  • From: musicdenotation@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS license
  • From: musicdenotation@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS license
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] The `lookup` function
  • From: musicdenotation@x
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Agreement to license
  • From: Jonathan Rees <jar@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Agreement to license
  • From: Jonathan Rees <jar@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] mutable unicode strings
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] mutable unicode strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] mutable unicode strings
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] mutable unicode strings
  • From: Bear <bear@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] mutable unicode strings
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] mutable unicode strings
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] mutable unicode strings
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] mutable unicode strings
  • From: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sam@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-small draft ratified by Steering Committee
  • From: ceving <ceving@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-small draft ratified by Steering Committee
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-small draft ratified by Steering Committee
  • From: John Boyle <johnthescavenger@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-small draft ratified by Steering Committee
  • From: Sanel Zukan <sanelz@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-small draft ratified by Steering Committee
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-small draft ratified by Steering Committee
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] R7RS-small draft ratified by Steering Committee
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] R7RS-small draft ratified by Steering Committee
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-users] R7RS-small draft ratified by Steering Committee
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [Chicken-hackers] R7RS-small draft ratified by Steering Committee
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] using let-syntax at case-lambda definition
  • From: Yuichi Nishiwaki <yuichi.nishiwaki@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] using let-syntax at case-lambda definition
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-small document available as HTML?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Gauche joins the ranks of the R7RS implementations
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Gauche joins the ranks of the R7RS implementations
  • From: Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer <taylanbayirli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Gauche joins the ranks of the R7RS implementations
  • From: Justin Ethier <justin.ethier@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Gauche joins the ranks of the R7RS implementations
  • From: Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Gauche joins the ranks of the R7RS implementations
  • From: Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer <taylanbayirli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Gauche joins the ranks of the R7RS implementations
  • From: OKUMURA Yuki <mjt@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: vnikolov@x (Vassil Nikolov | Васил Николов)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: Kevin Wortman <kwortman@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] editorial awkwardness for syntax-rules pattern-matching
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <sam@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] editorial awkwardness for syntax-rules pattern-matching
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] editorial awkwardness for syntax-rules pattern-matching
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: vnikolov@x (Vassil Nikolov | Васил Николов)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] editorial awkwardness for syntax-rules pattern-matching
  • From: vnikolov@x (Vassil Nikolov | Васил Николов)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: vnikolov@x (Vassil Nikolov | Васил Николов)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: vnikolov@x (Vassil Nikolov | Васил Николов)
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] ccil.org down but immutable lists SRFI still available
  • From: John Cowan <johnwcowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: Michael Montague <mikemon@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: Eli Barzilay <eli@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Immutable list SRFI updated
  • From: Kevin Wortman <kwortman@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Immutable list SRFI updated
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Immutable list SRFI updated
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Proposed new SRFI for immutable lists
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] An R5RS erratum that persisted into R7RS
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] exact-closed in features list
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] exact-closed in features list
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] 'else' auxiliary syntax
  • From: Takashi Kato <ktakashi@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 'else' auxiliary syntax
  • From: Takashi Kato <ktakashi@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 'else' auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 'else' auxiliary syntax
  • From: Takashi Kato <ktakashi@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 'else' auxiliary syntax
  • From: SAITO Atsushi <saito@x>
• [Scheme-reports] syntax-rules is not exported from (scheme r5rs)
  • From: Takashi Kato <ktakashi@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 'else' auxiliary syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 'else' auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 'else' auxiliary syntax
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 'else' auxiliary syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 'else' auxiliary syntax
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 'else' auxiliary syntax
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] 'else' auxiliary syntax
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Errors (?) in 7.2, Formal Semantics
  • From: William Cushing <william.cushing@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Errors (?) in 7.2, Formal Semantics
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] FYI - Kawa 2.0 supports r7rs
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] FYI - Kawa 2.0 supports r7rs
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] FYI - Kawa 2.0 supports r7rs
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Requesting early review of a character sequence library
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Requesting early review of a character sequence library
  • From: Jonathan A Rees <jar@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Requesting early review of a character sequence library
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Requesting early review of a character sequence library
  • From: Per Bothner <per@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Requesting early review of a character sequence library
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Requesting early review of a character sequence library
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: Requesting early review of a character sequence library
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: Requesting early review of a character sequence library
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: Requesting early review of a character sequence library
  • From: Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: Requesting early review of a character sequence library
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] split-string
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Regarding the String & Character Spans Library
  • From: Jesse Towner <townerj@x>
• [Scheme-reports] something's wrong with R7RS (small) erratum 5
  • From: William D Clinger <will@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] something's wrong with R7RS (small) erratum 5
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
• [Scheme-reports] Possible error in latest available draft of R7RS
  • From: Thorben Hasenpusch <t.hasenpusch@x>
• Re: [Scheme-reports] Possible error in latest available draft of R7RS
  • From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>