Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS large process discussion WAS Re: final draft of the R7RS small language

[Grant Rettke <grettke@x>]

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 8:03 PM, John Cowan <cowan@x> wrote:
> Alex Shinn scripsit:
>> and stating the motivation for including it in the large language.
>
> What would this consist of?  Something should go in the large language
> because it seems useful for practical Scheme programs.  That's a rather
> generic answer.

Is the flavor of SRFI, where it fits into WG2, more a codification of
what all distributions are doing, or, more like, things that make
sense?

It really won't be for new functionality looking to get adopted at
least as far as WG2 is concerned right?

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports