Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?

[Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>]

On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 13:40 -0500, Andre van Tonder wrote:

> Peter, the better way to do the kind of thing you are looking for
> is PARAMETERIZE.  I wouldn't advocate it for CASE, though.

Any pointers? Or is it the PLT/Racket thing?



_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports