Re: [Scheme-reports] Ballot item #113 "directory contents"

[Eli Barzilay <eli@x>]

Three hours ago, John Cowan wrote:
> Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit:
> 
> > Would you be willing to write a little bit about how this proposal
> > compares to what different Scheme implementations already provide?
> 
> AFAIK, only Kawa and MIT provide pathnames as a built-in, though
> there may be external packages that provide them on other systems.
> MIT is essentially CL in semantics, whereas Kawa is mostly about
> URIs.

Racket had a separate `path' type for a long time now.  (Though it's
nowhere near the CL headache, and has no relation to uris.)

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports