[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs
- To: Alex Queiroz <asandroq@x>
- Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.3.7 blobs
- From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 10:29:15 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: scheme-reports@x
- In-reply-to: <BANLkTi=gNxAwN+35HEA7Z6Sid51W4vOA2A@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <m38vu262p6.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <op.vvrej8vo0p3ku8@localhost> <m3aaehzu74.fsf@unquote.localdomain> <BANLkTi=gNxAwN+35HEA7Z6Sid51W4vOA2A@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 20 May 2011, Alex Queiroz wrote:
> True, but I think that more descriptive names are more
> Scheme-ish. I would expect to see BYTEVECTOR in a Scheme report, but
> not BLOB.
What about CONS, CAR, or CDR?
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports