[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #453: The denotational semantics
- To: sperber@x
- Subject: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #453: The denotational semantics
- From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 19:21:07 -0400
- Cc: scheme-reports@x
This is a Formal Response to Formal Comment #453:
The denotational semantics
The WG voted to retain the existing denotational semantics; dynamic-wind
was added to it.
The editors chose not to make a rigorous distinction between numbers
and Scheme objects that represent them.
The pointer to the Indiana repository has been replaced by pointers to
schemers.org and library.readscheme.org.
If you are dissatisfied with this Formal Response, please let us know.
Thank you for participating in the R7RS process.
Income tax, if I may be pardoned for saying so, John Cowan
is a tax on income. --Lord Macnaghten (1901) cowan@x
Scheme-reports mailing list