[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-large comparators
Noah Lavine scripsit:
> This is an excellent point. I would just like to add that it also makes it
> trivial to extend the comparator interface to partial orders - they could
> return 'not-comparable if their arguments couldn't be ordered.
Easy to extend the interface, but not so easy to extend the library as a whole.
John Cowan cowan@x http://ccil.org/~cowan
Rather than making ill-conceived suggestions for improvement based on
uninformed guesses about established conventions in a field of study with
which familiarity is limited, it is sometimes better to stick to merely
observing the usage and listening to the explanations offered, inserting
only questions as needed to fill in gaps in understanding. --Peter Constable
Scheme-reports mailing list