[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination
The current wording can be read a bit wider than requiring labels on
circular objects; that is, it can be read as display must terminate on
any objects (even if the object is implementation's extension), which
concerns me. If I can read it that the behavior only describes on the
domain of r7rs, I'm ok with it.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:33 PM, John Cowan <cowan@x> wrote:
> Aaron W. Hsu scripsit:
>> Did we actually vote to make display terminating?
> Ticket #388, ballot 6. You voted to leave the behavior unspecified, as
> did Art Gleckler, but all other votes were in favor of requiring labels.
> John Cowan <cowan@x> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
> Raffiniert ist der Herrgott, aber boshaft ist er nicht.
> --Albert Einstein
> Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports mailing list