Re: [Scheme-reports] display should not guarantee termination

[Shiro Kawai <shiro.kawai@x>]

The current wording can be read a bit wider than requiring labels on
circular objects; that is, it can be read as display must terminate on
any objects (even if the object is implementation's extension), which
concerns me.  If I can read it that the behavior only describes on the
domain of r7rs, I'm ok with it.


On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:33 PM, John Cowan <cowan@x> wrote:
> Aaron W. Hsu scripsit:
>
>> Did we actually vote to make display terminating?
>
> Ticket #388, ballot 6.  You voted to leave the behavior unspecified, as
> did Art Gleckler, but all other votes were in favor of requiring labels.
>
> --
> John Cowan  <cowan@x>  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
>         Raffiniert ist der Herrgott, aber boshaft ist er nicht.
>                 --Albert Einstein
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scheme-reports mailing list
> Scheme-reports@x
> http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports