[Scheme-reports] Formal Response #423: The list of cases where `eqv?` returns `#t` does not mention procedures

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

This is a Formal Response to Formal Comment #423:

The list of cases where `eqv?` returns `#t` does not mention procedures.

The WG voted to make procedures indiscernible by `eqv?`.  It is also 
now the case that procedures are added to the list of indiscernibles
by `eq?` in addition to numbers and characters.

If you are dissatisfied by this Formal Response, please let us know.
Thank you for participating in the R7RS process.

-- 
John Cowan                              cowan@x
            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Humpty Dump Dublin squeaks through his norse
                Humpty Dump Dublin hath a horrible vorse
But for all his kinks English / And his irismanx brogues
                Humpty Dump Dublin's grandada of all rogues.  --Cousin James

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports