Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI?

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Grant Rettke scripsit:

> > Another option is that of volunteering your services to the Steering
> > Committee as prospective chair of WG3.
>
> What is WG3?

At the moment it does not exist.  However, one of the ballot options on
WG2 packages is "pass on to a future WG", notionally known as WG3.  That
is, this is for packages which WG2 believe should exist, but which seem
too large, complex, ill-defined, etc. to work on at present.
See http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg2/ReassignedDocket for a list of these.

Of course, if WG3 were to actually come into being, it would have
to vote its own list of action items: WG2's list is just a set of
recommendations.

-- 
Where the wombat has walked,            John Cowan <cowan@x>
it will inevitably walk again.          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
   (even through brick walls!)

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports