[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] What is the role of standardization in things like FFI?
Grant Rettke scripsit:
> > Another option is that of volunteering your services to the Steering
> > Committee as prospective chair of WG3.
> What is WG3?
At the moment it does not exist. However, one of the ballot options on
WG2 packages is "pass on to a future WG", notionally known as WG3. That
is, this is for packages which WG2 believe should exist, but which seem
too large, complex, ill-defined, etc. to work on at present.
See http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg2/ReassignedDocket for a list of these.
Of course, if WG3 were to actually come into being, it would have
to vote its own list of action items: WG2's list is just a set of
Where the wombat has walked, John Cowan <cowan@x>
it will inevitably walk again. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
(even through brick walls!)
Scheme-reports mailing list