Re: [Scheme-reports] More NaN and Infsanity

[Peter Bex <Peter.Bex@x>]

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 01:01:09PM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> In any case, the numbers egg is buggy: it always returns an exact
> rational even if the arguments are inexact.

I know, I fixed that yesterday.  Having a closer look at rational
is what triggered this question :)

> Bawden's code may not be the fastest, but it's elegant:
> I suggest adopting it.

I'll take a look and consider it.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
							-- Donald Knuth

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports