On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x> wrote:(If so, it sounds like syntax parameters may be the solution. But at this point I'm just trying to make sure I understand the problem.)Yes, I believe syntax-parameters could be used. It would be clumsy, since themacros involved would have to syntax-parameterize the entire SRE language oneach expansion. But if we're entertaining non-standard extensions then it's muchsimpler, easier to port and more robust to just use an ER macro with unhygienicmatching.Thinking about it more, I don't quite see how syntax-parameters could do this.
_______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports