[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft

To: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
From: "Arthur A. Gleckler" <scheme@x>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 13:02:11 -0700
Cc: scheme-reports@x
In-reply-to: <1339098878.2655.6.camel@mantis.site>
References: <COL121-W27A68809C9A303F93D51C7D20D0@phx.gbl> <20120606195241.GB29088@mercury.ccil.org> <87ehpr3la5.fsf@netris.org> <CAMMPzYOE0=tut1VkQoUYcUyFeSMw1Vx2POzJ-R5RsTTQw0Ttaw@mail.gmail.com> <20120607193043.GG12177@mercury.ccil.org> <1339098878.2655.6.camel@mantis.site>

I agree with Aaron that we should not mention multi-threading in the implementations of `delay' and `force'. The meaning is just too different.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

References:
- [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  - From: Duncan Steele <steeleduncan@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  - From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
  - From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>

Prev by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
Next by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
Previous by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
Next by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread