[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] Redefinition and shadowing in module bodies?

To: scheme-reports@x
Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] Redefinition and shadowing in module bodies?
From: "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcfide@x>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 23:00:33 -0400
In-reply-to: <Pine.SOC.4.64.1104242207040.2185@oow.het.brown.edu>
Organization: Indiana University
References: <Pine.SOC.4.64.1104242207040.2185@oow.het.brown.edu>

On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 22:10:57 -0400, Andre van Tonder <andre@x>  
wrote:

> It is unclear from the section on modules whether we can portably
>
>   1) introduce a definition that shadows an import
>   2) redefine a previously defined variable or syntax binding

Are you talking about this in the module body or in the top-level REPL?

	Aaron W. Hsu

-- 
Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Redefinition and shadowing in module bodies?
  - From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>

References:
- [Scheme-reports] Redefinition and shadowing in module bodies?
  - From: Andre van Tonder <andre@x>

Prev by Date: [Scheme-reports] Introduction and additional material
Next by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] Redefinition and shadowing in module bodies?
Previous by thread: [Scheme-reports] Redefinition and shadowing in module bodies?
Next by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] Redefinition and shadowing in module bodies?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread