[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Ticket #281 withdrawn
Andre van Tonder scripsit:
> I don't think this ticket makes any sense. Neither x nor y should
> be required to be evaluable. It clashes with modules. It confuses
It bypasses modules and levels by operating with objects rather than
names for objects. I don't see that as necessarily a Bad Thing.
> It may cause problems for systems that invoke a compiler on the
> argument of EVAL.
That is, a compiler that accepts textual input rather than data
structures, CL:FILE-COMPILE rather than CL:COMPILE. This is why Andy's
earlier post confused me.
In any case, due to the volume and nature of the complaints, I have
withdrawn this ticket.
A: "Spiro conjectures Ex-Lax." John Cowan
Q: "What does Pat Nixon frost her cakes with?" cowan@x
--"Jeopardy" for generative semanticists http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Scheme-reports mailing list