[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Alan Watson <alan@x> wrote:
> Using addresses wouldn't work, generate-unique-value
> would have to increment a global counter (which need
> not be unique to this location).  Though if the counter
> ever overflows into a bignum all optimization is lost.

Sure, just

(define (generate-unique-value) (cons #t #t))

or something similar.

Naturally, but then it's faster to just cons up the procedure to begin with.


Scheme-reports mailing list