[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Per Bothner scripsit:
> In other words: mutable fixed-length strings are effectively useless,
> but we have to have mutable strings.
I am far from convinced of that. I think the arguments for providing
mutable strings only (simplicity, thread safety, sharability, memory
efficiency, no ownership issues, no copying) are quite convincing,
and I favored that position, but I couldn't get enough support in
WG1 to remove them from the language, since they are an IEEE feature.
(Just putting them in a separate module, especially a mandatory module
as is done in R6RS, doesn't really help implementers or users.)
> That just requires adding a few functions like string-replace-substring
> to make mutable strings into something actually usable. The normal
> implementation could be a simple buffer-gap.
I'd be happy to have a buffer-gap package in R7RS-large. I've added
it to the RevoteDocket (somewhat paradoxically named; it is really the
"input hopper" for new ideas).
> Is there an prior art for doing anything like that?
Emacs buffers is the obvious prior art.
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@x
Be yourself. Especially do not feign a working knowledge of RDF where
no such knowledge exists. Neither be cynical about RELAX NG; for in
the face of all aridity and disenchantment in the world of markup,
James Clark is as perennial as the grass. --DeXiderata, Sean McGrath
Scheme-reports mailing list