Re: [r6rs-discuss] [Scheme-reports] redefining eqv?

[Peter Kourzanov <peter.kourzanov@x>]

On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 15:39 -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Peter Kourzanov scripsit:
> 
> > > Peter, the better way to do the kind of thing you are looking for
> > > is PARAMETERIZE.  I wouldn't advocate it for CASE, though.
> > 
> > Any pointers? Or is it the PLT/Racket thing?
> 
> SRFI 39.
> 

So, RRS's (fluid) redux (or shall I say Rabbit redux). Its so 
well-hidden I didn't know it existed. Any plans on going back
that for R7RS?


_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
r6rs-discuss@x
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss