[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Objection: Memoization is not possible in portable R7RS
On 11/25/2012 06:07 PM, Alex Shinn wrote:
> The WG decided to make eqv? unspecified for NaNs
> independently of the eqv? semantics. Unless you are
> doing so now, no member of the community has made
> any objection to this decision.
No objection. I think it is a good idea for an implementation
to use the same-bits test, but it doesn't have to be a requirement.
Scheme-reports mailing list