[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i)
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, John Cowan wrote:
> Aubrey Jaffer scripsit:
>> Algebraically, the complex numbers are the field of reals extended by
>> a solution of x^2+1=0. All reals are complex; there is no difference
>> between real 2.0 and 2.0+0.0i.
> I used the term "general complex number" in the same sense it is used
> in R5RS, to mean a number whose imaginary part is nonzero.
If the term "general" is still used in R7RS to refer to a /proper subset/ of the
complex numbers (haven't done a search), I would say that this is a confusing
usage and should probably be changed. To most people, "general" does not mean a
Scheme-reports mailing list