[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: scope of #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case
- To: scheme-reports@x
- Subject: [Scheme-reports] Formal Comment: scope of #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case
- From: Richard Kelsey <kelsey@x>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:53:16 +0000 (UTC)
Formal Comment
Submitter's name: Richard Kelsey
Submitter's email: kelsey at s48.org
Relevant draft: r7rs draft 6
Type: clarification
Priority: minor
Relevant section of draft: Lexical conventions
Summary: scope of #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case
The description of #!fold-case and #!no-fold-case says that they
change the behavior of the 'read' procedure. I assume that this
doesn't mean that I can write things like:
(define (case-folding-read)
#!fold-case
(read))
but it would be nice if the report made this clear. Also, does
'load' pay attention to these?
I suggest that you drop the reference to 'read' and instead say
something like:
These directives may appear anywhere comments are permitted (see
section 2.2) and are treated as comments, except that they affect the
reading of subsequent data from the same port. The #!fold-case
directive causes subsequent identifers and character names to be be
case-folded (as if by string-foldcase; see section 6.7). (It has no
effect on character literals.) The #!no-fold-case directive causes
a return to the default, non-folding behavior.
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports