Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Peter Kourzanov scripsit:

> So, RRS's (fluid) redux (or shall I say Rabbit redux). Its so 
> well-hidden I didn't know it existed. Any plans on going back
> that for R7RS?

It's under WG1 ballot, and I think if it doesn't make WG1, it will
very likely make WG2.  There are several variants available besides the
SRFI itself.

It's easy to implement parameters portably in a non-threaded
system, so the proposals are about how mutation (as
opposed to rebinding, which is per-thread) interacts with
threads.  http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/ParametersSnellPym
defines parameters as thread-safe under mutation, whereas
http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/ImmutableParametersCowan excludes
mutation.

-- 
If I read "upcoming" in [the newspaper]              John Cowan
once more, I will be downcoming                      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
and somebody will be outgoing.                       cowan@x

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports