Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] Date and time arithmetic library proposal for R7RS large Scheme

["Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb@x>]

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Christopher Chittleborough <cchittleborough@x> wrote:

The 'century' values in the ISO chronology don't seem right.
If 1965 AD has century=19 in ISO, then 33 AD must have century=0
so 43 BC would have century=-1, not 0.

I think it's confusing to call this "century", since it's one off from the ordinal number of the century. Perhaps "hundreds" or something that is more digity sounding?

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports