[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Internal syntax definition order problem
Andre van Tonder scripsit:
> On p 19 internal syntax definitions are required to precede internal
Indeed, I don't know what the justification for that sentence is; it's not
something the WG voted on.
> This make it impossible to do, e.g., the following:
> (let ()
> (define-record-type A ....)
> (define-record-type B ....)
> if define-record-type expands into both syntax and variable definitions as in
> SRFI 9.
To save the appearances, one could construe the rule as applying only to
the text before macroexpansion, I suppose.
John Cowan cowan@x
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, LOTR:FOTR
Scheme-reports mailing list