Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Closing SRFI-112 and voting on it for R7RS-large

[Christian Stigen Larsen <csl@x>]

As I've understood, the voting process for R7RS WG2 may include public votes. So for the record, I vote yes. 

P.S. This is a straight-forward logging info API that does what it should and we should all accept it and move on to discussing the more comprehensive ones. 

Christian

> Den 13. sep. 2013 kl. 01:26 skrev John Cowan <cowan@x>:
> 
> John Cowan scripsit:
> 
>> 2) WG2 members and would-be members: please vote on accepting SRFI 112
>> <http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-112/srfi-112.html> as part of R7RS-large
>> in the (scheme inquiry) library.
> 
> I vote yes.
> 
> -- 
> John Cowan    cowan@x    http://ccil.org/~cowan
> The whole of Gaul is quartered into three halves.
>        --Julius Caesar
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Scheme-reports mailing list
> Scheme-reports@x
> http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
> 

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports