Re: [Scheme-reports] R7RS-small draft ratified by Steering Committee

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Sanel Zukan scripsit:

> Is this means that we are no longer allowed to write and support
> someting like:
> 
> (define (1+x x) (+ 1 x))
> 
> ?

If you are an implementer, you certainly can provide such a procedure.

If you are a user, and you care about standards conformance,
you should choose a different identifier, as 1+x has never been a
standards-conformant identifier under *any* version of the Scheme
standard.  However, most Scheme implementations will accept 1+x as a
valid identifier.

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@x
In computer science, we stand on each other's feet.  --Brian K. Reid

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports