[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping

To: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping
From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 05:54:58 -0400
Cc: William D Clinger <will@x>, scheme-reports <scheme-reports@x>
In-reply-to: <CAMMPzYMC0AA6eN1hQs8zt3VMQy9iNpURcWp2gSf31AQRgVw9Cg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <23182326.1946811368389348253.JavaMail.root@zimbra> <9477480.1946891368389490933.JavaMail.root@zimbra> <20130512234033.GF32521@mercury.ccil.org> <CAMMPzYMC0AA6eN1hQs8zt3VMQy9iNpURcWp2gSf31AQRgVw9Cg@mail.gmail.com>

Alex Shinn scripsit:

> We should just revert this - it was treated as editorial but has some
> subtle semantic implications.

Hearing and obedience, effendi!  Change committed and pushed.

-- 
There are three kinds of people in the world:   John Cowan
those who can count,                            cowan@x
and those who can't.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

References:
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping
  - From: will@x
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping
  - From: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>

Prev by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping
Next by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] Why define-library requires a explicit begin form?
Previous by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] Post-plebiscite issue #3: structure-sharing for mapping
Next by thread: [Scheme-reports] Why define-library requires a explicit begin form?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread