[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small

To: scheme-reports@x
Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
From: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:59:08 +0200
In-reply-to: <5177F071.9090801@sonic.net> (Ray Dillinger's message of "Wed, 24 Apr 2013 07:47:13 -0700")
References: <51779B53.7050507@snell-pym.org.uk> <5177F071.9090801@sonic.net>

Picking a random message...

> the language we're working on is not, in fact, Scheme as we have
> up to now understood it.

I wish we would stop with these essentialist critiques.  They are
impossible to discuss in any rational manner.  The same thing happened
with R6RS, with similarly baffling results.

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  - From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@x>

References:
- [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  - From: Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
  - From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>

Prev by Date: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
Next by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
Previous by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
Next by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] Ratification vote for R7RS-small
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread