[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Typos with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.6 <def formals> and <definition> ?
- To: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>
- Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] Typos with R7RS draft 8 section 7.1.6 <def formals> and <definition> ?
- From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:22:46 -0500
- Cc: scheme-reports <scheme-reports@x>
- In-reply-to: <CAMMPzYN-OkpSvOgaFVSRM5do5rjTxvV3+_WrnwjZs8Moi=1yfQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <FB3B3EA4-40DB-4E0B-8721-CED003CC4DF4@lovely.email.ne.jp> <CAMMPzYN-OkpSvOgaFVSRM5do5rjTxvV3+_WrnwjZs8Moi=1yfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Alex Shinn scripsit:
> Neither of these are correct, since
>
> (define-values <identifier> <body>)
>
> is valid. We'll fix this.
Oops, yes, of course. It's (define-values <formals> <body>), as specified
in chapter 4.
--
The experiences of the past show John Cowan
that there has always been a discrepancy cowan@x
between plans and performance. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
--Emperor Hirohito, August 1945
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports