[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>*Subject*: Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0*From*: John Cowan <cowan@x>*Date*: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:22:55 -0500*Cc*: scheme-reports <scheme-reports@x>*In-reply-to*: <CAMMPzYP_=CbUkLJOHQbrqYQCRtrvU8PC36D-OQyMe0DyVZbp0g@mail.gmail.com>*References*: <878v8z5iq8.fsf@tines.lan> <874njn5b65.fsf@tines.lan> <20121215204015.GG13463@mercury.ccil.org> <87obhv3ts0.fsf@tines.lan> <20121215231548.GC10312@mercury.ccil.org> <87bodu4r0r.fsf@tines.lan> <20121216041031.GE10312@mercury.ccil.org> <87pq25yh5s.fsf@tines.lan> <20121219221955.GH4477@mercury.ccil.org> <CAMMPzYP_=CbUkLJOHQbrqYQCRtrvU8PC36D-OQyMe0DyVZbp0g@mail.gmail.com>

Alex Shinn scripsit: > I love this reasoning. So every Scheme supports mixed exactness > quaternions. What a progressive language. Well, maybe so if we had standard procedures jmag-part and kmag-part for looking inside them. But anyway, my reasoning was wrong: some systems return 0 as the imag-part of an inexact real, whereas others return 0.0. I've collected the data and will be integrating it into ComplexRepresentations. -- John Cowan cowan@x http://ccil.org/~cowan You cannot enter here. Go back to the abyss prepared for you! Go back! Fall into the nothingness that awaits you and your Master. Go! --Gandalf _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@x http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

**References**:**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*John Cowan <cowan@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*John Cowan <cowan@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*John Cowan <cowan@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*John Cowan <cowan@x>

**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0***From:*Alex Shinn <alexshinn@x>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0** - Next by Date:
**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0** - Previous by thread:
**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0** - Next by thread:
**Re: [Scheme-reports] Strong win later reversed: Real numbers have imaginary part #e0** - Index(es):