Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Closing SRFI-112 and voting on it for R7RS-large

I vote yes. This SRFI is useful, widely supportable,

and well contained.

Faré's concern that additional information may be

needed is valid, however the items he mentions are

specific to ABI and FFI introspection, which is

currently outside the scope of WG2.

Alex

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:24 AM, John Cowan <cowan@x> wrote:

Well, for personal reasons I haven't done anything on Scheme for about a
month, but I'm starting up again.

1) SRFI editors: please finalize SRFI 112.

2) WG2 members and would-be members: please vote on accepting SRFI 112
<http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-112/srfi-112.html> as part of R7RS-large
in the (scheme inquiry) library.

Votes will be accepted until Monday, September 23 at noon UTC. Vote
by responding to this email on the scheme-reports-wg2@x
mailing list. A valid vote consists of either "yes" or "no", plus
any comments you want to add. If you have trouble posting, send your
vote to me and I will forward it. (Kevin Wortman, your existing vote
will stand unless you tell me otherwise.)

--
By Elbereth and Luthien the Fair, you shall cowan@x
have neither the Ring nor me! --Frodo http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scheme-reports-wg2" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scheme-reports-wg2+unsubscribe@x.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.