[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Checking implementation features and Scheme name?
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 1:01 PM, John Cowan <cowan@x> wrote:
> Stefan Edwards scripsit:
>> What about loading alternative implementation of a feature, such as
>> falling back onto the reference implementation of a SRFI if the Scheme
>> you're using doesn't provide one? I actually think this would ease
>> writing libraries likes SLIB or Nausicaa that support multiple Scheme
>> implementations and have to Spackle the gaps in features between them.
> If possible that should be done using cond-expand in the module
Exactly. That's the primary (and currently only) use of features.
We're talking about potential secondary uses.
Scheme-reports mailing list