[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence

To: scheme-reports-wg2@x
Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 14:49:26 -0400
Cc: scheme-reports@x
In-reply-to: <CAC_pKx-8fdQjBiC6R4RuL1XhdvZ75Lma8ORQ5YdZaCqs_yCaAA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87zk9jor6s.fsf@netris.org> <20120507213136.GA12719@mercury.ccil.org> <CAAMbixJnUMuoaYSmwb3Fuoko-SFJNpBDTbDGjBFS2t4V0oZ8mQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120508190658.GA12928@mercury.ccil.org> <4FA99DF7.50000@bothner.com> <4FA9B028.5010306@sonic.net> <CAC_pKx_EzTHRehsHDOSqXqiC9MhZasY8Yf=G_5rVVWywjVGKsQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC_pKx-8fdQjBiC6R4RuL1XhdvZ75Lma8ORQ5YdZaCqs_yCaAA@mail.gmail.com>

Emmanuel Medernach scripsit:

> Here is a WG2 proposal for a "NaN dissecting" library:
>   http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/NanMedernach

Thanks for working on this.

> Comments are welcome.

Added to the page at the bottom.

-- 
He played King Lear as though           John Cowan <cowan@x>
someone had played the ace.             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --Eugene Field

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  - From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>

References:
- [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  - From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  - From: Andrew Robbins <andjrob@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  - From: Per Bothner <per@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  - From: Ray Dillinger <bear@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  - From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>
- Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
  - From: Emmanuel Medernach <emmanuel.medernach@x>

Prev by Date: [Scheme-reports] Some comments after reading the r7rs public draft
Next by Date: Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
Previous by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
Next by thread: Re: [Scheme-reports] [scheme-reports-wg2] Re: EQV? on numbers should be based on operational equivalence
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread