[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Current tickets for the 5th ballot - 281
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 09/30/2011 01:50 PM, Andre van Tonder wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, Alaric Snell-Pym wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> On 09/29/2011 05:25 PM, Andre van Tonder wrote:
>>> On a system that that invokes a compiler on the argument of EVAL, the
>>> may depend on the textual representation of the code '(cons 1 2). It
>>> may even
>>> do certain optimizations and rewritings based on the textual
>>> Again, having procedure objects in here confuses levels and can cause
>>> for such a compiler.
>> Does it really? Can anyone point to an implementation of EVAL that can't
>> cope with this?
> I don't think Larceny's eval can cope with this.
Why is that? How does it work? What's the architectural tradeoff they've
made? MORE DATA :-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Scheme-reports mailing list