[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Exception handling
On Mon 02 May 2011 11:51, Alaric Snell-Pym <alaric@x> writes:
> Yes, I think that would be good to fix. However, I'm not too upset that
> it's not defined in WG1, as it looks like the sort of thing that will
> emerge as a de-facto standard after some trial and error, and then be
> standardised in R8RS or similar.
An aside: it really would be nice to change our report naming
convention. "Scheme 7", "Scheme 8", etc sound much better.
Scheme-reports mailing list