Re: [Scheme-reports] DISCUSSION/VOTE: The character tower

[John Cowan <cowan@x>]

Bear scripsit:

> This goes well beyond "not like the specification" - this 
> is into the realm of "apparently do not comprehend the basic
> values informing the specification."

The basic value in question is to standardize what the _maior et
sanior pars_ of Scheme implementations (to say nothing of non-Scheme
implementations) actually do.

> I think that forbidding the bug fix is incomprehensible, 
> and must reveal some agenda or value completely alien to 
> my whole way of thinking. Therefore I don't believe that 
> I am capable of meaningfully contributing to a discussion 
> of these strings.  

Well, stick around; other issues will be taken up here.

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@x
Yes, chili in the eye is bad, but so is your ear.  However, I would
suggest you wash your hands thoroughly before going to the toilet.
        --gadicath

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports