[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Scheme-reports] <body> of let-syntax

...for that matter shouldn't it also be "zero or more expressions" ?

..and while this may already have been mentioned in the past, it may not be possible to decide what the elements of <body> are (definitions or expressions) until after expanding them using the syntax definitions provided.


On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Takashi Kato <ktakashi@x> wrote:
Re-send with removing bogus empty lines.

Hi there,

The description of <body> at 4.3.1. says;
<body> is a sequence of one or more definitions followed by one or more
expressions.

Should this be 'zero or more definitions'? Otherwise I could read this
like let-syntax must have at least one internal definition.

Cheers,

--
_/_/
Takashi Kato
E-mail: ktakashi@x

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports