[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
Just to mention, there is nothing wrong with implementations providing
optimized versions of portable packages.
In many cases (99%+) R6RS packages (aka a bunch of libraries) runs without
issues on many implementations.
A portable package should still be able to run on any implementation
regardless of the optimized version.
> Part of R7RS-large is to get those standard names at least for a
> reasonable set of packages.
> Note that this will only work (for some values of "work") for packages
> with portable implementations.
Scheme-reports mailing list