[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.6 dynamic bindings
- To: Andy Wingo <wingo@x>
- Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] 4.2.6 dynamic bindings
- From: John Cowan <cowan@x>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 14:01:54 -0400
- Cc: scheme-reports <scheme-reports@x>
- In-reply-to: <m3wrhm7k6q.fsf@unquote.localdomain>
- References: <m3wrhm7k6q.fsf@unquote.localdomain>
Andy Wingo scripsit:
> Is the body of a `parameterize' form meant to be only expressions, or
> are internal definitions allowed as well?
>
> Suggestion: allow internal definitions.
SRFI 39 agrees, and so do the implementations that support it. Fixed.
--
Si hoc legere scis, nimium eruditionis habes.
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@x
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports